Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Jun 1;78(6):1460-1470. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad106.
We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis.
A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions.
The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion.
Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.
通过群体药代动力学和目标达成分析,确定对重症患者使用头孢吡肟的合理经验性给药方案。
在两个 ICU 地点对 130 名重症患者进行了前瞻性和机会性药代动力学(PK)研究。采用经验证的 LC-MS/MS 方法测定头孢吡肟的血浆浓度。使用非线性混合效应模型方法同时分析所有头孢吡肟 PK 数据。通过蒙特卡罗模拟评估不同肾功能患者采用不同剂量方案时,不同 MIC 值下头孢吡肟的达标概率(PTA)。
头孢吡肟在重症患者中的 PK 最好用两室模型来描述,具有零级输入和一级消除。肌酐清除率和体重被确定为重要的协变量。我们的模拟结果表明,与传统的 0.5 小时间歇性输注相比,延长 3 小时输注并不能显著提高目标达成率。相比之下,对于给定的每日剂量,连续输注比 0.5 小时或 3 小时间歇性输注提供更高的折点覆盖率。为了平衡目标达成率和潜在的神经毒性,头孢吡肟 3 g/天连续输注似乎比 6 g/天连续输注更好的给药方案。
连续输注可能是重症患者头孢吡肟治疗的一种有前途的策略。有了机构和/或单位特定的头孢吡肟药敏模式以及个体患者的肾功能,我们的 PTA 结果可能为医生制定剂量决策提供有用的参考。