Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Faculty of Humanities, Department of Languages, Literature and Communication & Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1563-1587. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00379. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
Previous studies have found that typically developing (TD) children were able to compensate and adapt to auditory feedback perturbations to a similar or larger degree compared to young adults, while children with speech sound disorder (SSD) were found to produce predominantly following responses. However, large individual differences lie underneath the group-level results. This study investigates possible mechanisms in responses to formant shifts by modeling parameters of feedback and feedforward control of speech production based on behavioral data.
SimpleDIVA was used to model an existing dataset of compensation/adaptation behavior to auditory feedback perturbations collected from three groups of Dutch speakers: 50 young adults, twenty-three 4- to 8-year-old children with TD speech, and seven 4- to 8-year-old children with SSD. Between-groups and individual within-group differences in model outcome measures representing auditory and somatosensory feedback control gain and feedforward learning rate were assessed.
Notable between-groups and within-group variation was found for all outcome measures. Data modeled for individual speakers yielded model fits with varying reliability. Auditory feedback control gain was negative in children with SSD and positive in both other groups. Somatosensory feedback control gain was negative for both groups of children and marginally negative for adults. Feedforward learning rate measures were highest in the children with TD speech followed by children with SSD, compared to adults.
The SimpleDIVA model was able to account for responses to the perturbation of auditory feedback other than corrective, as negative auditory feedback control gains were associated with following responses to vowel shifts. These preliminary findings are suggestive of impaired auditory self-monitoring in children with complex SSD. Possible mechanisms underlying the nature of following responses are discussed.
先前的研究发现,与年轻成年人相比,正常发育(TD)儿童能够在更大程度上补偿和适应听觉反馈的变化,而言语障碍(SSD)儿童则主要产生跟随反应。然而,群体水平的结果掩盖了较大的个体差异。本研究通过基于言语产生的反馈和前馈控制的参数建模,研究了对共振峰转移的反应中可能存在的机制。
使用 SimpleDIVA 对来自三个荷兰语说话者群体的听觉反馈扰动补偿/适应行为的现有数据集进行建模:50 名年轻成年人、23 名 4 至 8 岁具有 TD 言语的儿童和 7 名 4 至 8 岁具有 SSD 的儿童。评估了代表听觉和躯体感觉反馈控制增益和前馈学习率的模型结果指标的组间和个体内差异。
所有的结果指标都发现了显著的组间和个体内差异。为个体说话者建模的数据产生了具有不同可靠性的模型拟合。SSD 儿童的听觉反馈控制增益为负,而其他两个群体为正。两组儿童的躯体感觉反馈控制增益均为负,而成年人则为负。前馈学习率指标在具有 TD 言语的儿童中最高,其次是具有 SSD 的儿童,而成年人则较低。
SimpleDIVA 模型能够解释除了纠正之外的听觉反馈的变化,因为负的听觉反馈控制增益与元音变化的跟随反应有关。这些初步发现表明,复杂 SSD 儿童的听觉自我监测受损。讨论了产生跟随反应的潜在机制。