Yang Fu-An, Lin Chien-Lin, Huang Wan-Chien, Wang Hsun-Yi, Peng Chih-Wei, Chen Hung-Chou
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei.
Department of Medical Education, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Apr;37(4):228-239. doi: 10.1177/15459683231167850. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
In recent meta-analyses, robot-assisted gait training for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have yielded limited clinical benefits compared with conventional overground gait training.
To investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with MS on clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases from their inception to April 7, 2022. We selected studies that (1) included participants with MS, (2) used robot-assisted gait training as the intervention, (3) included conventional overground gait training or another gait training protocol as control treatment, and (4) reported clinical outcomes. Continuous variables are expressed as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.
We included 16 studies enrolling 536 participants. Significant improvement was observed in the intervention group, with low heterogeneity at the end of the intervention with regard to walking velocity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.15, 0.60]), walking endurance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), mobility (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.14]), balance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), and fatigue (SMD: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.49, -0.04]). The results of subgroup analyses revealed improvements in these outcomes for the intervention group using grounded exoskeletons. No significant differences were noted in all the outcomes between the groups at follow-up.
Robot-assisted gait training with grounded exoskeletons exerts a positive short-term effect and is an adequate treatment option for patients with MS.
在最近的荟萃分析中,与传统的地面步态训练相比,机器人辅助步态训练对多发性硬化症(MS)患者产生的临床益处有限。
通过系统评价和荟萃分析,研究机器人辅助步态训练对MS患者临床结局的影响。
我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和物理治疗证据数据库中检索了从数据库建立至2022年4月7日的相关研究。我们选择的研究需满足:(1)纳入MS患者;(2)采用机器人辅助步态训练作为干预措施;(3)纳入传统地面步态训练或其他步态训练方案作为对照治疗;(4)报告临床结局。连续变量以标准化均数差值及95%置信区间表示。使用RevMan 5.4软件进行统计分析。
我们纳入了16项研究,共536名参与者。干预组有显著改善,干预结束时在步行速度(标准化均数差值[SMD]:0.38,95%置信区间[CI]:[0.15,0.60])、步行耐力(SMD:0.26,95%CI[0.04,0.48])、活动能力(SMD:-0.37,95%CI[-0.60,-0.14])、平衡能力(SMD:0.26,95%CI[0.04,0.48])和疲劳(SMD:-0.27,95%CI[-0.49,-0.04])方面异质性较低。亚组分析结果显示,使用地面外骨骼的干预组在这些结局方面有所改善。随访时两组在所有结局方面均未观察到显著差异。
使用地面外骨骼的机器人辅助步态训练具有积极的短期效果,是MS患者的一种合适治疗选择。