文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

调强放疗时代局部晚期鼻咽癌同期放化疗对比单纯放疗

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 519 Kunzhou Road, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Department of Head and Neck Surgery Section II, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 519 Kunzhou Road, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jul;280(7):3097-3106. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07943-9. Epub 2023 Apr 20.


DOI:10.1007/s00405-023-07943-9
PMID:37079074
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has long been a standardized therapy for localized advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. It is widely used in clinical applications. In contrast, NCCN guidelines highlight that the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal cancer in the new era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy has not been defined. Thus, we systematically reviewed the significance of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: We searched the relevant literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, extracting relevant data from the searched literature. The main items extracted were hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). When the HR could not be extracted from the literature, we used Engauge Digitizer software for extraction. Data analysis was accomplished using the Review Manager 5.4 tool. RESULTS: Our study included seven articles involving 1633 cases of stage II nasopharyngeal cancer. The survival outcomes were overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.03, 95% CI (0.71-1.49), P = 0.87), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.59-1.39), P = 0.66), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.57-1.93), P = 0.87), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (HR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.41-1.84), P = 0.71, P > 0.05), and locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) (HR = 1.18, 95% CI (0.52-2.70), P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone have the same survival benefits, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases acute hematological toxicity. Subgroup analysis showed that for people with N1 nasopharyngeal cancer at risk of distant metastases, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone also had equal survival benefits.

摘要

背景:同期放化疗长期以来一直是局部晚期鼻咽癌的标准化治疗方法。它在临床应用中得到了广泛应用。相比之下,NCCN 指南强调,在调强放疗新时代,同期放化疗治疗 II 期鼻咽癌的疗效尚未确定。因此,我们系统地回顾了同期放化疗治疗 II 期鼻咽癌的意义。

方法:我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中搜索相关文献,从检索文献中提取相关数据。提取的主要项目包括风险比(HRs)、风险比(RRs)和 95%置信区间(CIs)。当无法从文献中提取 HR 时,我们使用 Engauge Digitizer 软件进行提取。数据分析使用 Review Manager 5.4 工具完成。

结果:我们的研究包括七篇文章,涉及 1633 例 II 期鼻咽癌患者。生存结果为总生存(OS)(HR=1.03,95%CI(0.71-1.49),P=0.87)、无进展生存(PFS)(HR=0.91,95%CI(0.59-1.39),P=0.66)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)(HR=1.05,95%CI(0.57-1.93),P=0.87)、局部无复发生存(LRFS)(HR=0.87,95%CI(0.41-1.84),P=0.71,P>0.05)和局部区域无失败生存(LFFS)(HR=1.18,95%CI(0.52-2.70),P=0.69)。

结论:在调强放疗时代,同期放化疗和单纯放疗具有相同的生存获益,同期放化疗增加急性血液学毒性。亚组分析表明,对于有远处转移风险的 N1 期鼻咽癌患者,同期放化疗和单纯放疗也具有相同的生存获益。

相似文献

[1]
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023-7

[2]
The role of concurrent chemotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2018-3-22

[3]
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-9-13

[4]
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23

[5]
Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for adults with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-27

[6]
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-22

[7]
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4

[8]
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-8-31

[9]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[10]
Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small-volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-12-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Concurrent vs. sequential chemoradiotherapy: a survival boost for lung cancer patients.

Biomed Eng Online. 2025-5-16

[2]
Retrospective analysis of 1539 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases: chemotherapy should not be excluded for non-Asian patients with T1-2N1M0 stage.

Front Oncol. 2025-1-17

[3]
[A simulation study of the reliability and accuracy of Cox-TEL method for estimating hazard ratio and difference in proportions for long-term survival data containing cured patients].

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024-6-20

本文引用的文献

[1]
Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

Cancer Med. 2022-2

[2]
Explore the Usefulness of Concurrent Chemotherapy in Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Front Pharmacol. 2021-9-21

[3]
External Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Survival and Benefit of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-8-25

[4]
Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies.

Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2021-1

[5]
Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Does Not Improve Treatment Outcomes for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Front Oncol. 2020-8-7

[6]
Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for treatment of intermediate-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Radiat Oncol. 2020-3-16

[7]
Survival of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with or without concurrent chemotherapy: A propensity score matching study.

Cancer Med. 2020-2

[8]
Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting the benefit of concurrent chemotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A study based on a phase III randomized clinical trial with 10-year follow-up.

Oral Oncol. 2019-11-29

[9]
Ten-Year Outcomes Of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Combine With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone For Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In The Real-World Study (RWD).

Cancer Manag Res. 2019-10-10

[10]
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Lancet. 2019-6-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索