Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1, Minami-Kogushi, Ube, 755-8505, Japan.
J Artif Organs. 2024 Jun;27(2):146-153. doi: 10.1007/s10047-023-01396-x. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
The anteversion of the stem is occasionally intentionally changed by the surgeon for patients with smaller femoral neck anteversion during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the reproducibility of preoperative planning with increasing anteversion has been rarely assessed. The present study investigated it using two types of stems. This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary posterolateral THA using taper-wedge (TS group; 73 hips) and anatomical (AS group; 70 hips) stems. Characteristics of sex and age were matched in the two groups by propensity score matching. In both groups, the relationship between the preoperative three-dimensional planning and postoperative stem position, and the relationship between postoperative stem position and femoral neck anteversion (FNA) were evaluated. In the TS group, there were no significant differences in average stem anteversion (SA) between preoperative planning and postoperative placement (36.1° ± 7.0° and 36.6° ± 11.1°, respectively: p = 0.651). The absolute error of SA was 8.1° ± 6.4°. In the AS group, the postoperative SA was significantly smaller than the preoperative planning SA (22.7° ± 11.6° and 30.0° ± 9.3°, respectively: p < 0.001). The absolute error of SA was 9.0° ± 5.8°. The postoperative SA was significantly larger than the FNA in the TS group (36.6° ± 11.1° and 26.3° ± 10.9°, respectively: p < 0.001). However, no significant differences between the two were observed in the AS group (23.7° ± 10.1° and 22.7° ± 11.6°, respectively: p = 0.253). The preoperative planning of intentional increasing anteversion did not show high reproducibility with taper-wedge and anatomical stems. The anatomical stem was placed according to the femoral medullary canal regardless of preoperative planning with increased SA.
在全髋关节置换术 (THA) 中,对于股骨颈前倾角较小的患者,外科医生偶尔会故意改变柄的前倾角。然而,增加前倾角的术前规划的可重复性很少被评估。本研究使用两种类型的柄进行了研究。这项回顾性研究包括了接受经后侧入路使用锥形(TS 组;73 髋)和解剖型(AS 组;70 髋)柄进行初次 THA 的患者。通过倾向评分匹配,两组在性别和年龄特征上相匹配。在两组中,都评估了术前三维规划与术后柄位置之间的关系,以及术后柄位置与股骨颈前倾角(FNA)之间的关系。在 TS 组中,术前规划与术后实际柄前倾角(SA)之间无显著差异(分别为 36.1°±7.0°和 36.6°±11.1°:p=0.651)。SA 的绝对误差为 8.1°±6.4°。在 AS 组中,术后 SA 显著小于术前规划 SA(分别为 22.7°±11.6°和 30.0°±9.3°:p<0.001)。SA 的绝对误差为 9.0°±5.8°。在 TS 组中,术后 SA 显著大于 FNA(36.6°±11.1°和 26.3°±10.9°:p<0.001)。然而,在 AS 组中,两者之间没有显著差异(分别为 23.7°±10.1°和 22.7°±11.6°:p=0.253)。使用锥形和解剖型柄,增加前倾角的术前规划没有表现出很高的可重复性。解剖型柄是根据股骨髓腔放置的,而不考虑术前增加的 SA 规划。