Ma Mohan, Xiao Chuman, Ou Wenwen, Lv Guanyi, Huang Mei, Zhao Xiaotian, Qin Yaqi, Ju Yumeng, Zhang Yan
Department of Psychiatry, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Mental Health Institute of Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders (Xiangya), China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 4;14:1160791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160791. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Affective Lability Scale-short form (ALS-SF) among Chinese patients with mood disorders, and to compare ALS-SF subscale scores between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and patients with bipolar disorder (BD) depression.
A total of 344 patients with mood disorders were included in our study. Participants were measured through a set of questionnaires including the Chinese version of ALS-SF, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), and NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to examine the psychometric properties of ALS-SF. Besides, correlation and regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between affective lability and depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. Independent samples -tests were used to compare the subscale scores of ALS-SF between the MDD and BD depression groups.
Results of factor analysis indicated that the model of ALS-SF was consistent with ALS-SF. The ALS-SF showed a solid validity and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.861). In addition, each subscale of ALS-SF was significantly correlated with PHQ-9, GAD-7, and NEO-FFI neuroticism subscale, except for the anger subscale showed no significant correlation with PHQ-9. Besides, the depression/elation and anger factor scores in patients with BD depression were higher than in patients with MDD.
Our study suggests that the Chinese version of ALS-SF has good reliability and validity for measuring affective lability in Chinese patients with mood disorders. Assessing affective lability would assist clinicians to distinguish between MDD and BP depression and may decrease the risks of misdiagnosis.
本研究旨在调查中文版情感易激惹量表简表(ALS-SF)在中国心境障碍患者中的心理测量学特性,并比较重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和双相情感障碍(BD)抑郁发作患者的ALS-SF各子量表得分。
本研究共纳入344例心境障碍患者。通过一系列问卷对参与者进行测量,包括中文版ALS-SF、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表(GAD-7)和大五人格量表(NEO-FFI)。应用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来检验ALS-SF的心理测量学特性。此外,进行相关性和回归分析以探讨情感易激惹与抑郁、焦虑和神经质之间的关系。采用独立样本t检验比较MDD组和BD抑郁发作组的ALS-SF子量表得分。
因素分析结果表明,ALS-SF的模型与原量表一致。ALS-SF具有良好的效度和较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.861)。此外,除愤怒子量表与PHQ-9无显著相关性外,ALS-SF的各子量表与PHQ-9、GAD-7及NEO-FFI神经质子量表均显著相关。此外,BD抑郁发作患者的抑郁/欣快和愤怒因子得分高于MDD患者。
我们的研究表明,中文版ALS-SF在测量中国心境障碍患者的情感易激惹方面具有良好的信度和效度。评估情感易激惹有助于临床医生区分MDD和BD抑郁发作,并可能降低误诊风险。