• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎前路椎间融合术后住院时间对患者报告结局和临床结局的影响。

Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Patel Madhav R, Jacob Kevin C, Chavez Frank A, Parsons Alexander W, Seetharaman Meenakshi, Pawlowski Hanna, Prabhu Michael C, Vanjani Nisheka N, Singh Kern

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):205-214. doi: 10.14444/8414. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

DOI:10.14444/8414
PMID:37085322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing literature has not yet evaluated the impact of postoperative length of stay (LOS) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The authors investigates the influence of postoperative LOS following ALIF on PROMs and MCID achievement rates.

METHODS

A single-surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing single-level ALIF. The following 2 cohorts were studied: patients with LOS <45 hours and patients with LOS ≥45 hours. The following PROMs were recorded at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints: visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item short form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and patient-reported outcome measurement information system physical function. MCID achievement was compared by LOS grouping using analysis. The rates of complications by LOS grouping and the relative risk among demographic and perioperative characteristics for a longer hospital stay of ≥45 hours were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 52 subjects were included in each cohort. LOS ≥45 hours demonstrated worse ODI at 6 weeks and SF-12 PCS preoperative and at 12 weeks ( ≤ 0.026, all). LOS <45 hours demonstrated greater MCID rates for all PROMs except VAS back ( ≤ 0.004, all). Postoperative urinary retention (POUR), fever, and total complications ( ≤ 0.003, all) were associated with increased LOS. Diabetes ( = 0.037), preoperative VAS neck ≥7 ( = 0.012), and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥2 ( = 0.003) served as preoperative risk factors for postoperative stay ≥45 hours.

CONCLUSION

Following single-level ALIF, patients with shorter LOS demonstrated significantly greater overall MCID achievement for most PROMs. POUR, fever, and total complications were associated with longer LOS and greater blood loss. Diabetes and higher preoperative leg pain were identified as risk factors for longer LOS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients undergoing ALIF with shorter LOS had greater MCID achievement for disability, physical function, and leg pain outcomes. Patients with greater preoperative leg pain and diabetes may be at risk for longer LOS.

摘要

背景

现有文献尚未评估腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)患者术后住院时间(LOS)对患者报告结局指标(PROMs)和最小临床重要差异(MCID)的影响。作者调查了ALIF术后LOS对PROMs和MCID达成率的影响。

方法

对接受单节段ALIF手术的患者的单外科医生数据库进行回顾性研究。研究了以下两组队列:LOS<45小时的患者和LOS≥45小时的患者。在术前以及术后6周、12周、6个月、1年和2年的时间点记录以下PROMs:视觉模拟量表(VAS)背部和腿部评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、12项简短形式(SF-12)身体综合评分(PCS)以及患者报告结局测量信息系统身体功能评分。使用分析方法按LOS分组比较MCID达成情况。计算按LOS分组的并发症发生率以及住院时间≥45小时的患者在人口统计学和围手术期特征方面的相对风险。

结果

每个队列共纳入52名受试者。LOS≥45小时的患者在术后6周时ODI更差,术前及术后12周时SF-12 PCS更差(均P≤0.026)。LOS<45小时的患者在除VAS背部评分外的所有PROMs方面MCID达成率更高(均P≤0.004)。术后尿潴留(POUR)、发热和总并发症发生率(均P≤0.003)与LOS延长相关。糖尿病(P = 0.037)、术前VAS颈部评分≥7分(P = 0.012)以及美国麻醉医师协会分级≥2级(P = 0.003)是术后住院时间≥45小时的术前危险因素。

结论

在单节段ALIF术后,LOS较短的患者在大多数PROMs方面总体MCID达成情况显著更好。POUR、发热和总并发症与更长的LOS及更多的失血相关。糖尿病和术前腿痛程度较高被确定为LOS延长的危险因素。

临床意义

接受ALIF手术且LOS较短的患者在残疾、身体功能和腿痛结局方面MCID达成情况更好。术前腿痛程度较高和患有糖尿病的患者可能有LOS延长的风险。

相似文献

1
Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎前路椎间融合术后住院时间对患者报告结局和临床结局的影响。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):205-214. doi: 10.14444/8414. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与前路腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症的比较。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Nov 1;30(21):e1382-e1390. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01152. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.L5/S1 节段单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与前路腰椎体间融合联合后路内固定术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e111-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.108. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前残疾严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者报告结局及患者满意度的影响
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e334-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.接受微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)治疗的工人赔偿接受者的临床结局的恢复率和最小临床重要差异。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):315-323. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05468-4. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.腰椎间盘切除术后肌肉健康与患者报告结果的关系:早期结果。
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1677-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
7
Worse Preoperative 12-Item Veterans Rand Physical Component Scores Prognosticate Inferior Outcomes Following Outpatient Lumbar Decompression.术前 Veterans Rand 生理成分 12 项评分较差预示门诊腰椎减压术后预后不良。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Oct 1;37(8):E339-E347. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001602. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.呈现的身体功能对微创腰椎减压术后患者满意度及临床结果的影响
Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Feb 1;36(1):E6-E13. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001360. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review].术前退伍军人 RAND-12 身体综合评分对接受前路腰椎间融合术患者的影响 [回顾性研究]。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 May;123:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
10
Does Baseline Mental Health Influence Outcomes among Workers' Compensation Claimants Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?基线心理健康状况是否会影响接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的工伤索赔者的治疗结果?
Asian Spine J. 2023 Feb;17(1):96-108. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0388. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The modern application of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a narrative review of perioperative considerations and surgical pearls.腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)的现代应用:围手术期注意事项及手术要点的叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):148-165. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-85. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
MRI-based central sarcopenia negatively impacts the therapeutic effectiveness of single-segment lumbar fusion surgery in the elderly.基于 MRI 的中央型骨骼肌减少症会对老年单节段腰椎融合手术的治疗效果产生负面影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):5043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55390-1.
3
Fundamentals of Mechanobiology and Potential Applications in Spinal Fusion.力学生物学基础及其在脊柱融合中的潜在应用
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 27;17(S3):S61-S74. doi: 10.14444/8562.
4
The safety and effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术患者加速康复外科(ERAS)用于老年骨科手术患者的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6535-6545. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04963-2. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of anterior vs. posterior approach to single-level lumbar spinal fusion with interbody device: An analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.后路与前路单节段腰椎融合伴椎间融合器的疗效对比:全国住院患者样本分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;212:107061. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107061. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.L5/S1 节段单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与前路腰椎体间融合联合后路内固定术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e111-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.108. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: single institutional review of complications and associated variables.腰椎前路椎间融合术:并发症及相关变量的单机构回顾
Spine J. 2022 Mar;22(3):454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
4
A retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes in single-level degenerative lumbar disease undergoing anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.对接受前路与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的单节段退变性腰椎疾病的影像学和临床结果进行回顾性比较。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;7(2):170-180. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-673.
5
Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting.门诊手术环境下采用多模式镇痛管理的门诊微创腰椎融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):970-981. doi: 10.14444/7146. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Analyzing the Correlation Between Surgeon Experience and Patient Length of Hospital Stay.分析外科医生经验与患者住院时间之间的相关性。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 28;12(8):e10099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10099.
7
ALIF in the correction of spinal sagittal misalignment. A systematic review of literature.前路椎间融合术(ALIF)在矫正脊柱矢状面失平衡中的应用:文献系统回顾。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jan;30(1):50-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06598-y. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF.与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后住院时间延长及90天再入院率相关的因素
Global Spine J. 2020 May;10(3):252-260. doi: 10.1177/2192568219843111. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Evaluation of Postoperative Mental Health Outcomes in Patients Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.基于患者报告结局测量信息系统身体功能评估前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后患者的心理健康结局
Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):184-189. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938256.128. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Trends in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the United States: A MarketScan Study From 2007 to 2014.美国前路腰椎间融合术的趋势:一项 2007 至 2014 年 MarketScan 研究。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):E226-E230. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000904.