Thomas Ewan, Rossi Carlo, Petrigna Luca, Messina Giuseppe, Bellafiore Marianna, Şahin Fatma Neşe, Proia Patrizia, Palma Antonio, Bianco Antonino
Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Via Giovanni Pascoli 6, 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Anatomy, Histology and Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n°97, 95123 Catania, Italy.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Mar 30;8(2):40. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020040.
Upright bipedal posture is the physiological human posture; however, it is not the only possible form of human standing; indeed, an inverted position, a handstand, is required during gymnastics or other sports. Thus, this study aimed to understand the differences between the two standing strategies from a postural and neuromuscular perspective. Thirteen gymnasts with at least three years of sports experience underwent a baropodometric assessment and a surface electromyography (sEMG) examination in a standard upright bipodalic stance and during a handstand. The sEMG examination was performed on the gastrocnemius during an upright stance and on the flexor carpi radialis during the handstand. Limb weight distribution presented differences between the two vertical stances ( < 0.01). During the handstand, the weight ratio was prevalently observed on the palm of the hand for both hands with a significant difference between the front and rear aspect of the hand compared to the standing tasks ( < 0.01). Normalized sEMG amplitude showed significant differences during bipedal standing and hand standing; however, over a 5 s period, the normalized median frequency (MDF) value was similar for the two tasks. Both standing tasks presented similar postural weight managing patterns when analysed on the frontal plane, but they were different on the sagittal plane. In addition, the neuromuscular patterns during a 5 s window differ in amplitude but not for the frequency domain.
直立双足姿势是人类的生理姿势;然而,它并非人类站立的唯一可能形式;事实上,在体操或其他运动中需要倒立姿势,即手倒立。因此,本研究旨在从姿势和神经肌肉角度了解这两种站立策略之间的差异。13名具有至少三年运动经验的体操运动员在标准直立双足姿势和手倒立过程中接受了压力平台测量评估和表面肌电图(sEMG)检查。sEMG检查在直立姿势时对腓肠肌进行,在手倒立时对桡侧腕屈肌进行。肢体重量分布在两种垂直姿势之间存在差异(<0.01)。在手倒立过程中,双手的重量比例主要分布在手掌上,与站立任务相比,手的前后方面存在显著差异(<0.01)。归一化sEMG幅度在双足站立和手倒立期间显示出显著差异;然而,在5秒时间段内,两项任务的归一化中位频率(MDF)值相似。在额平面上分析时,两种站立任务呈现出相似的姿势重量管理模式,但在矢状面上有所不同。此外,在5秒窗口内的神经肌肉模式在幅度上有所不同,但在频域上没有差异。