Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital (Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital), Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3212-3220. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14200. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively analyse the effectiveness of using proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screws (DHS) to treat intertrochanteric fractures on postoperative surgical site infections (SSI). PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases were searched from their inception until December 2022 to identify studies that compared PFNA and DHS in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Two investigators independently screened the retrieved studies to assess their quality and verify their eligibility for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed with RevMan 5.4 software. Thirty studies, including 3158 patients, met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1574 patients treated with PFNA, and 1584 were treated with DHS. The findings of the meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSI in patients treated with PFNA compared with those treated with DHS (2.64% vs 6.76%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.40, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.28-0.57, P < .001), superficial SSI (2.58% vs 5.01%, OR: 0.53, 95% CIs: 0.33-0.85, P = .008) and deep SSI (1.26% vs 3.43%, OR: 0.41, 95% CIs: 0.19-0.92, P = .03). PFNA was more effective than DHS in reducing the incidence of SSI. Even so, significant variations in sample sizes among the included studies meant that the methodology for some studies had qualitative deficiencies. Therefore, additional studies with large sample sizes are needed to validate these results.
在这项研究中,进行了荟萃分析,以全面分析使用股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)治疗股骨转子间骨折术后手术部位感染(SSI)的效果。从建库开始到 2022 年 12 月,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库中搜索了比较 PFNA 和 DHS 治疗股骨转子间骨折的研究。两名调查员独立筛选检索到的研究,以评估其质量并验证其纳入的资格。使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行荟萃分析。符合纳入标准的研究共有 30 项,共 3158 例患者。这些研究包括 1574 例接受 PFNA 治疗的患者和 1584 例接受 DHS 治疗的患者。荟萃分析的结果显示,与 DHS 组相比,PFNA 组 SSI 发生率显著降低(2.64% vs 6.76%,优势比 [OR]:0.40,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.28-0.57,P < 0.001),包括浅部 SSI(2.58% vs 5.01%,OR:0.53,95%CI:0.33-0.85,P = 0.008)和深部 SSI(1.26% vs 3.43%,OR:0.41,95%CI:0.19-0.92,P = 0.03)。PFNA 降低 SSI 发生率的效果优于 DHS。即便如此,纳入研究的样本量存在显著差异,这意味着一些研究的方法存在质量缺陷。因此,需要开展更多大样本量的研究来验证这些结果。