• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Triple and Quadruple Combination Pills vs Monotherapy, Usual Care, or Placebo for the Initial Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.低剂量三联和四联组合药物与单药治疗、常规护理或安慰剂在高血压初始治疗中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;8(6):606-611. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0720.
2
Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Randomized Clinical Trial.固定低剂量三联抗高血压药物与常规护理治疗斯里兰卡轻中度高血压患者的血压控制:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):566-579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10359.
3
Association of Low-Dose Triple Combination Therapy vs Usual Care With Time at Target Blood Pressure: A Secondary Analysis of the TRIUMPH Randomized Clinical Trial.低剂量三联疗法与常规治疗对目标血压时间的影响:TRIUMPH 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;7(6):645-650. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0471.
4
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
5
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension.双重α和β受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 26;2015(8):CD007449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2.
6
Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.降压治疗与血压水平相关的死亡率和心血管疾病的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Combination therapy versus monotherapy as initial treatment for stage 2 hypertension: a prespecified subgroup analysis of a community-based, randomized, open-label trial.联合治疗与单药治疗作为2期高血压初始治疗的比较:一项基于社区的随机开放标签试验的预设亚组分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Apr;30(4):661-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.04.013.
9
Initial treatment with a single pill containing quadruple combination of quarter doses of blood pressure medicines versus standard dose monotherapy in patients with hypertension (QUARTET): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial.在高血压患者中,使用包含四分之一剂量的四种降压药物的单片复方制剂进行单药初始治疗与标准剂量单药治疗的疗效比较(QUARTET):一项 3 期、随机、双盲、阳性对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1043-1052. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01922-X. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
Association of Low-Dose Triple Combination Therapy With Therapeutic Inertia and Prescribing Patterns in Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the TRIUMPH Trial.低剂量三联疗法与高血压患者治疗惰性和处方模式的关联:TRIUMPH 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1219-1226. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2739.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-Dose Combinations With 3 or 4 Blood Pressure-Lowering Medications for the Treatment of Hypertension.用于治疗高血压的含3种或4种降压药物的低剂量联合用药
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 18;4(7):101883. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101883.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Triple Single Pill Combination Versus Standard Care in the Management of Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials.低收入和中等收入国家中低剂量三联单片复方制剂与标准治疗方案治疗高血压的疗效和安全性:三项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s40292-025-00720-1.
3
Area-level socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension care cascade in China: a nationwide population-based study based on the ChinaHEART project.中国高血压治疗流程中的地区层面社会经济不平等:基于中国心脏调查项目的全国性人群研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Apr 4;57:101544. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101544. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Low Adherence to High Blood Pressure Treatments: Innovative Solutions Are Needed.高血压治疗依从性低:需要创新解决方案。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e039045. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039045. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Efficacy of Chinese traditional quadruple single pill combination versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension (COSPQ-BP): study protocol for randomised controlled study.中药四联单片复方制剂与缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压的疗效比较(COSPQ-BP):一项随机对照研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e092109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092109.
6
The efficacy and safety of low-dose triple combination for hypertension treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.小剂量三联疗法治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-03790-z.
7
Treatment Strategies to Control Blood Pressure in People With Hypertension in Tanzania and Lesotho: A Randomized Clinical Trial.坦桑尼亚和莱索托高血压患者血压控制的治疗策略:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 1;10(4):321-333. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5124.
8
Preoperative activation of the renin-angiotensin system and myocardial injury in noncardiac surgery: exploratory mechanistic analysis of the SPACE randomised controlled trial.非心脏手术中肾素-血管紧张素系统的术前激活与心肌损伤:SPACE随机对照试验的探索性机制分析
Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1300-1307. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.040. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
9
Effect of three-drug single-pill antihypertensive combinations in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.三联单片复方降压药对血压控制不佳患者的疗效
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1983-1984. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04323-y. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low-dose antihypertensive combinations in patients with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较低剂量降压联合治疗方案在高血压患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e086323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086323.

低剂量三联和四联组合药物与单药治疗、常规护理或安慰剂在高血压初始治疗中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Triple and Quadruple Combination Pills vs Monotherapy, Usual Care, or Placebo for the Initial Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;8(6):606-611. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0720.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0720
PMID:37099314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10134039/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Low-dose combination (LDC) antihypertensives consisting of 3 or 4 blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs have emerged as a potentially important therapy for the initial management of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of LDC therapies for the management of hypertension.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Medline were searched from date of inception until September 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials comparing LDC consisting of 3 or 4 BP-lowering drugs compared to either monotherapy, usual care, or placebo.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted by 2 independent authors and synthesized using both random and fixed-effects models using risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was mean reduction in systolic BP (SBP) between LDC and monotherapy, usual care, or placebo. Other outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients achieving BP less than 140/90 mm Hg, rates of adverse effects, and treatment withdrawal.

RESULTS

Seven trials with a total of 1918 patients (mean [mean range] age, 59 [50-70] years; 739 [38%] female) were included. Four trials involved triple-component LDC and 3 involved quadruple-component LDC. At 4 to 12 weeks follow-up, LDC was associated with a greater mean reduction in SBP than initial monotherapy or usual care (mean reduction, 7.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 4.3-10.5) and placebo (mean reduction, 18.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, 15.1-20.8). LDC was associated with a higher proportion of participants achieving BP less than 140/90 mm Hg at 4 to 12 weeks compared to both monotherapy or usual care (66% vs 46%; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52) and placebo (54% vs 18%; RR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.93-4.77). There was no significant heterogeneity between trials enrolling patients with and without baseline BP-lowering therapy. Results from 2 trials indicated LDC remained superior to monotherapy or usual care at 6 to 12 months. LDC was associated with more dizziness (14% vs 11%; RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00-1.63) but no other adverse effects nor treatment withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings in the study showed that LDCs with 3 or 4 antihypertensives were an effective and well-tolerated BP-lowering treatment option for the initial or early management of hypertension.

摘要

重要性

由 3 种或 4 种降压药物组成的低剂量联合(LDC)降压药已成为高血压初始治疗的一种潜在重要疗法。

目的

评估 LDC 治疗高血压的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

从成立日期到 2022 年 9 月,在 PubMed 和 Medline 上进行了搜索。

研究选择

比较由 3 种或 4 种降压药物组成的 LDC 与单药治疗、常规护理或安慰剂的随机临床试验。

数据提取和综合

由两名独立作者提取数据,并使用随机和固定效应模型,使用二项结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的平均差异来综合数据。

主要结局和措施

主要结局是 LDC 与单药治疗、常规护理或安慰剂相比,收缩压(SBP)的平均降低。其他感兴趣的结局包括血压低于 140/90mmHg 的患者比例、不良反应发生率和治疗停药率。

结果

纳入了 7 项共 1918 名患者的试验(平均[平均范围]年龄,59[50-70]岁;739[38%]为女性)。4 项试验涉及三联药物 LDC,3 项涉及四联药物 LDC。在 4 至 12 周的随访中,LDC 与初始单药治疗或常规护理(平均降低 7.4mmHg;95%CI,4.3-10.5)和安慰剂(平均降低 18.0mmHg;95%CI,15.1-20.8)相比,SBP 的平均降低更为显著。与单药治疗或常规护理相比,LDC 在 4 至 12 周时达到血压低于 140/90mmHg 的患者比例更高(66% vs 46%;RR,1.40;95%CI,1.27-1.52)和安慰剂(54% vs 18%;RR,3.03;95%CI,1.93-4.77)。纳入有和没有基线降压治疗的患者的试验之间没有显著的异质性。两项试验的结果表明,LDC 在 6 至 12 个月时仍优于单药治疗或常规护理。LDC 与更多的头晕(14% vs 11%;RR 1.28,95%CI 1.00-1.63)相关,但无其他不良反应或治疗停药。

结论和相关性

研究结果表明,含 3 种或 4 种降压药物的 LDC 是一种有效且耐受良好的降压治疗选择,可用于高血压的初始或早期治疗。