Balaguer-Martí José Carlos, Canet-López Álvaro, Peñarrocha-Diago Miguel, Romeo-Rubio Marta, Peñarrocha-Diago María, García-Mira Berta
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Jan-Feb;38(1):157-168. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9796.
To assess the accuracy of totally guided implant placement with static surgical splints in relation to the different types of supporting tissues (tooth, mucosa, or bone). This review was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was done of the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, without publication year or language restrictions. The literature search yielded a total of 877 articles; 18 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 16 of these articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The included studies presented a high risk of bias, except for one randomized clinical trial. The strength of the recommendations is therefore weak. In the angular deviation treatment, statistically significant differences were observed in the accuracy of the implants with tooth vs bone support: Bone support yielded 1.31 degrees greater deviation vs tooth support (SD = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.47, 2.15, = .002). No significant differences were observed in the linear deviations. Tooth support proved to be significantly more precise than bone support splints. There were no differences referring to horizontal coronal deviation, horizontal apical deviation, or vertical deviation according to the type of splint support used.
评估使用静态外科夹板进行完全引导种植体植入相对于不同类型支持组织(牙齿、黏膜或骨)的准确性。本综述按照PRISMA指南进行。对MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了电子检索,无出版年份或语言限制。文献检索共获得877篇文章;18篇纳入定性综合分析,其中16篇纳入定量分析。除一项随机临床试验外,纳入的研究存在较高的偏倚风险。因此,推荐强度较弱。在角度偏差治疗中,观察到种植体在牙齿支持与骨支持情况下准确性存在统计学显著差异:骨支持比牙齿支持产生的偏差大1.31度(标准差=0.43;95%置信区间:0.47,2.15,P=.002)。在线性偏差方面未观察到显著差异。牙齿支持被证明比骨支持夹板明显更精确。根据所使用的夹板支持类型,在水平冠部偏差、水平根尖偏差或垂直偏差方面没有差异。