Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai-Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai-Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Respir Investig. 2023 Jul;61(4):409-417. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
We sometimes experience disinhibition during bronchoscopy with sedation. However, the impact of adding pethidine on disinhibition has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to examine the additive impact of pethidine on disinhibition during bronchoscopy with midazolam.
This retrospective study involved consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy between November 2019 and December 2020 (sedated with midazolam: Midazolam group) and between December 2020 and December 2021 (sedated with midazolam plus pethidine: Combination group). The severity of disinhibition was defined as follows: moderate, disinhibition that always needed restraints by assistants; and severe, disinhibition that needed antagonization of sedation by flumazenil to continue bronchoscopy. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to match baseline characteristics between both groups.
After propensity score matching with depression, the type of bronchoscopic procedure, and the dose of midazolam, 142 patients matched in each group. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe disinhibition significantly decreased from 16.2% to 7.8% (P = 0.028) in the Combination group. The Combination group had significantly better scores for sensation after bronchoscopy and feelings toward bronchoscopy duration than did the Midazolam group. Although the minimum SpO during bronchoscopy was significantly lower (88.0 ± 6.2 mmHg vs. 86.7 ± 5.0 mmHg, P = 0.047) and the percentage of oxygen supplementation significantly increased (71.1% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.001) in the Combination group, no fatal complications were observed.
Adding pethidine could reduce disinhibition occurrence in patients undergoing bronchoscopy with midazolam, with better subjective patient outcomes during and after bronchoscopy. However, whether more patients may need oxygen supplementation and whether hypoxia occurs during bronchoscopy should be considered.
UMIN000042635.
我们在镇静状态下进行支气管镜检查时有时会出现抑制解除。然而,添加哌替啶对抑制解除的影响尚未得到研究。本研究旨在检查哌替啶对咪达唑仑镇静下支气管镜检查时抑制解除的附加影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 12 月(咪达唑仑镇静:咪达唑仑组)和 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月(咪达唑仑加哌替啶镇静:联合组)期间接受支气管镜检查的连续患者。抑制解除的严重程度定义为:中度,抑制解除始终需要助手进行约束;严重,抑制解除需要氟马西尼拮抗镇静以继续支气管镜检查。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配法比较两组间的基线特征。
经过抑郁、支气管镜检查类型和咪达唑仑剂量的倾向评分匹配后,每组匹配 142 例患者。联合组中度至重度抑制解除的发生率从 16.2%显著下降至 7.8%(P=0.028)。联合组在支气管镜检查后感觉和对支气管镜检查持续时间的感觉方面的评分明显优于咪达唑仑组。虽然联合组支气管镜检查时最低 SpO2(88.0±6.2mmHg 与 86.7±5.0mmHg,P=0.047)显著降低,且需要氧补充的比例(71.1%与 86.6%,P=0.001)显著增加,但未观察到致命性并发症。
在咪达唑仑镇静下进行支气管镜检查时,添加哌替啶可降低抑制解除的发生,并且在支气管镜检查期间和之后患者的主观结局更好。然而,应该考虑是否有更多的患者需要氧补充,以及在支气管镜检查期间是否会发生缺氧。
UMIN000042635。