Suppr超能文献

MRI 并不提高髋关节关节炎分级系统的组内或组间可靠性。

MRI Does Not Improve Inter- or Intrarater Reliability for Hip Arthritis Grading Systems.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jun;51(7):1826-1830. doi: 10.1177/03635465231167866. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and radiographs are often utilized in assessing for preoperative osteoarthritis in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery.

PURPOSE

To determine if MRI scans improve inter- or intrarater reliabilities over radiographs for findings of hip arthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Anteroposterior and cross-table lateral radiographs as well as a representative coronal and sagittal T2-weighted MRI scan were reviewed for 50 patients by 7 experienced subspecialty hip preservation surgeons, with a minimum experience of 10 years. Radiographs and MRI scans were assessed for joint space narrowing, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, Likert osteoarthritis grade (none, mild, moderate, or severe), and Tönnis grade. MRI scans were also evaluated for bony edema, heterogeneous articular cartilage, and chondral defects. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated utilizing the Fleiss method with a 95% CI.

RESULTS

The scans of 50 patients (28 female and 22 male) with a mean age of 42.8 years (SD, 14.2 years; range, 19-70 years) were reviewed. Radiographs revealed fair agreement for joint space narrowing (κ = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.21-0.30]), osteophytes (κ = 0.26 [95% CI, 0.14-0.40]), Likert osteoarthritis grading (κ = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.28-0.37]) and Tönnis grade (κ = 0.30 [95% CI, 0.26-0.34). Radiographs revealed moderate agreement for subchondral cysts (κ = 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.69]). MRI scans demonstrated poor to fair agreement for joint space narrowing (κ = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.09-0.21]), subchondral sclerosis (κ = 0.27 [0.19-0.34]), heterogeneous articular cartilage (κ = 0.07 [95% CI, 0.00-0.14]), Likert osteoarthritis grade (κ = 0.19 [95% CI, 0.15-0.24]), and Tönnis grade (κ = 0.20 [95% CI, 0.15-0.24]). MRI scans demonstrated substantial agreement for subchondral cysts (κ = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.83]). Intrarater reliabilities were statistically improved compared with interrater reliabilities, but no differences were found between radiographs and MRI scans for joint space narrowing, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, osteoarthritis grade, or Tönnis grade.

CONCLUSION

Radiographs and MRI scans had substantial limitations and inconsistency between raters in evaluating common markers of hip osteoarthritis. MRI scans demonstrated strong reliability in evaluating for subchondral cysts but did not improve the interobserver variability of grading hip arthritis.

摘要

背景

磁共振成像(MRI)扫描和 X 光片常用于评估接受髋关节保 存手术的患者的术前骨关节炎。

目的

确定 MRI 扫描是否比 X 光片在髋关节关节炎的发现方面提高了 观察者内或观察者间的可靠性。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据水平,3 级。

方法

由 7 名经验丰富的髋关节保 存外科专家对 50 名患者的前后位和交叉位外侧 X 光片以及代表性的冠状位和矢状位 T2 加权 MRI 扫描进行评估,每位专家的最低经验为 10 年。对关节间隙狭窄、软骨下囊肿、骨赘、软骨下硬化、Likert 骨关节炎分级(无、轻度、中度或重度)和 Tönnis 分级进行 X 光片和 MRI 扫描评估。还评估了 MRI 扫描的骨水肿、不均匀性关节软骨和软骨缺损。使用 Fleiss 方法计算 95%CI 的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

结果

共评估了 50 名患者(28 名女性和 22 名男性)的扫描结果,平均年龄为 42.8 岁(标准差,14.2 岁;范围,19-70 岁)。X 光片显示关节间隙狭窄(κ = 0.25 [95%CI,0.21-0.30])、骨赘(κ = 0.26 [95%CI,0.14-0.40])、Likert 骨关节炎分级(κ = 0.33 [95%CI,0.28-0.37])和 Tönnis 分级(κ = 0.30 [95%CI,0.26-0.34])具有较好的一致性。X 光片显示软骨下囊肿具有中度一致性(κ = 0.53 [95%CI,0.35-0.69])。MRI 扫描显示关节间隙狭窄(κ = 0.15 [95%CI,0.09-0.21])、软骨下硬化(κ = 0.27 [0.19-0.34])、不均匀性关节软骨(κ = 0.07 [95%CI,0.00-0.14])、Likert 骨关节炎分级(κ = 0.19 [95%CI,0.15-0.24])和 Tönnis 分级(κ = 0.20 [95%CI,0.15-0.24])具有较差到较好的一致性。MRI 扫描显示软骨下囊肿具有很强的一致性(κ = 0.73 [95%CI,0.63-0.83])。观察者内可靠性在统计学上优于观察者间可靠性,但在评估髋关节间隙狭窄、软骨下囊肿、骨赘、骨关节炎分级或 Tönnis 分级方面,X 光片和 MRI 扫描之间没有差异。

结论

X 光片和 MRI 扫描在评估髋关节骨关节炎的常见标志物方面具有很大的局限性和观察者间的不一致性。MRI 扫描在评估软骨下囊肿方面具有很强的可靠性,但不能提高髋关节关节炎分级的观察者间可变性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验