Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Sarcoma Translational Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, DKTK-Partner-Site, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ann Oncol. 2023 Jul;34(7):615-625. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
The current treatment paradigm of imatinib-resistant metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) does not incorporate KIT/PDGFRA genotypes in therapeutic drug sequencing, except for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST that is indicated for avapritinib treatment. Here, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing was used to analyze plasma samples prospectively collected in the phase III VOYAGER trial to understand how the KIT/PDGFRA mutational landscape contributes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and to determine its clinical validity and utility.
VOYAGER (N = 476) compared avapritinib with regorafenib in patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GIST previously treated with imatinib and one or two additional TKIs (NCT03465722). KIT/PDGFRA ctDNA mutation profiling of plasma samples at baseline and end of treatment was assessed with 74-gene Guardant360® CDx. Molecular subgroups were determined and correlated with outcomes.
A total of 386/476 patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant tumors underwent baseline (pre-trial treatment) ctDNA analysis; 196 received avapritinib and 190 received regorafenib. KIT and PDGFRA mutations were detected in 75.1% and 5.4%, respectively. KIT resistance mutations were found in the activation loop (A-loop; 80.4%) and ATP-binding pocket (ATP-BP; 40.8%); 23.4% had both. An average of 2.6 KIT mutations were detected per patient; 17.2% showed 4-14 different KIT resistance mutations. Of all pathogenic KIT variants, 28.0% were novel, including alterations in exons/codons previously unreported. PDGFRA mutations showed similar patterns. ctDNA-detected KIT ATP-BP mutations negatively prognosticated avapritinib activity, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 1.9 versus 5.6 months for regorafenib. mPFS for regorafenib did not vary regardless of the presence or absence of ATP-BP/A-loop mutants and was greater than mPFS with avapritinib in this population. Secondary KIT ATP-BP pocket mutation variants, particularly V654A, were enriched upon disease progression with avapritinib.
ctDNA sequencing efficiently detects KIT/PDGFRA mutations and prognosticates outcomes in patients with TKI-resistant GIST treated with avapritinib. ctDNA analysis can be used to monitor disease progression and provide more personalized treatment.
目前,伊马替尼耐药转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的治疗模式并未将 KIT/PDGFRA 基因型纳入治疗药物排序,除了 PDGFRA 外显子 18 突变的 GIST,其适合接受阿伐普利尼治疗。在此,通过对 III 期 VOYAGER 试验中前瞻性采集的血浆样本进行循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)测序,以了解 KIT/PDGFRA 突变图谱如何导致酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)耐药,并确定其临床有效性和实用性。
VOYAGER(N=476)比较了阿伐普利尼与regorafenib 在先前接受伊马替尼和一种或两种额外 TKI 治疗的 KIT/PDGFRA 突变 GIST 患者中的疗效(NCT03465722)。使用 74 基因 Guardant360® CDx 对基线和治疗结束时的血浆样本进行 KIT/PDGFRA ctDNA 突变分析。确定分子亚组,并与结局相关联。
共有 386/476 例 KIT/PDGFRA 突变肿瘤患者进行了基线(试验前治疗)ctDNA 分析;196 例接受阿伐普利尼治疗,190 例接受regorafenib 治疗。分别检测到 75.1%和 5.4%的 KIT 和 PDGFRA 突变。KIT 耐药突变发生在激活环(A 环;80.4%)和 ATP 结合口袋(ATP-BP;40.8%);23.4%同时存在这两种突变。每位患者平均检测到 2.6 种 KIT 突变;17.2%显示 4-14 种不同的 KIT 耐药突变。所有致病性 KIT 变体中,28.0%是新的,包括以前未报道的外显子/密码子改变。PDGFRA 突变也表现出相似的模式。ctDNA 检测到的 KIT ATP-BP 突变对阿伐普利尼的活性具有负预后意义,阿伐普利尼的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为 1.9 个月,而regorafenib 为 5.6 个月。无论是否存在 ATP-BP/A 环突变,regorafenib 的 mPFS 均无差异,且大于该人群中阿伐普利尼的 mPFS。在阿伐普利尼治疗期间,疾病进展时会出现继发性 KIT ATP-BP 口袋突变变体,特别是 V654A。
ctDNA 测序可有效检测 KIT/PDGFRA 突变,并预测接受阿伐普利尼治疗的 TKI 耐药 GIST 患者的结局。ctDNA 分析可用于监测疾病进展并提供更个体化的治疗。