Avian Immunosuppressive Diseases Division, State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China.
Viruses. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):945. doi: 10.3390/v15040945.
Despite highly effective vaccines, Marek's disease (MD) causes great economic loss to the poultry industry annually, largely due to the continuous emergence of new MD virus (MDV) strains. To explore the pathogenic characteristics of newly emerged MDV strains, we selected two strains (AH/1807 and DH/18) with clinically different pathotypes. We studied each strain's infection process and pathogenicity and observed differences in immunosuppression and vaccine resistance. Specific pathogen-free chickens, unvaccinated or vaccinated with CVI988, were challenged with AH/1807 or DH/18. Both infections induced MD damage; however, differences were observed in terms of mortality (AH/1807: 77.8%, DH/18: 50%) and tumor rates (AH/1807: 50%, DH/18: 33.3%). The immune protection indices of the vaccine also differed (AH/1807: 94.1, DH/18: 61.1). Additionally, while both strains caused interferon-β and interferon-γ expression to decline, DH/18 infection caused stronger immunosuppression than AH/1807. This inhibition persisted even after vaccination, leading to increased replication of DH/18 that ultimately broke through vaccine immune protection. These results indicate that both strains have different characteristics, and that strains such as DH/18, which cause weaker pathogenic damage but can break through vaccine immune protection, require further attention. Our findings increase the understanding of the differences between epidemic strains and factors underlying MD vaccination failure in China.
尽管有高度有效的疫苗,但马立克氏病(MD)每年仍给家禽业造成巨大的经济损失,这主要是由于新的 MD 病毒(MDV)株不断出现。为了探索新出现的 MDV 株的致病特征,我们选择了两株具有临床不同病理型的菌株(AH/1807 和 DH/18)。我们研究了每种菌株的感染过程和致病性,并观察了免疫抑制和疫苗抗性的差异。用无特定病原体的鸡,未接种或用 CVI988 接种,用 AH/1807 或 DH/18 进行攻毒。两种感染都引起了 MD 损伤;然而,在死亡率(AH/1807:77.8%,DH/18:50%)和肿瘤率(AH/1807:50%,DH/18:33.3%)方面存在差异。疫苗的免疫保护指数也不同(AH/1807:94.1,DH/18:61.1)。此外,虽然两种菌株都导致干扰素-β和干扰素-γ的表达下降,但 DH/18 感染引起的免疫抑制比 AH/1807 更强。这种抑制甚至在接种疫苗后仍然存在,导致 DH/18 的复制增加,最终突破疫苗的免疫保护。这些结果表明,两种菌株具有不同的特征,而像 DH/18 这样的菌株,其致病性损伤较弱但能突破疫苗免疫保护,需要进一步关注。我们的研究结果增加了对中国流行株之间差异以及 MD 疫苗接种失败的因素的认识。