Global Ocean Accounts Partnership, Sustainable Development Reform Hub, Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Tangaroa Blue Foundation, PO Box 1235, Dunsborough, WA, 6281, Australia.
Environ Pollut. 2023 Aug 1;330:121731. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121731. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
Plastic pollution poses environmental and socio-economic risks, requiring policy and management interventions. The evidence-base for informing management and evaluation of their effectiveness is limited. Partnerships with citizen scientists provide opportunities to increase the spatio-temporal scale of monitoring programs, where training and standardised protocols provides opportunities for the use of data in addressing multiple hypotheses. Here, we provide a baseline of debris trends and infer debris drivers of abundance across 18° of latitude, using 168 surveys from 17 beaches across Queensland, Australia through the ReefClean project. Plastics were the dominant material (87% of total debris, with hard, soft and foam plastics aggregated), although linking recovered debris to sources was limited, as 67% of items were fragmented. We tested potential drivers of specific debris types (i.e., plastics, commercial fishing items, items dumped at-sea, and single-use items) and identified significant relationships between debris accumulation with distance from the nearest population centre and site characteristics (modal beach state, beach orientation and across-beach section). Management efforts should consider beach type and orientation within site selection, as an opportunity to maximise the amount recovered, alongside other criteria such as the risks posed by debris on environmental, economic, and social values. This study demonstrates the utility of citizen science to provide baselines and infer drivers of debris, through data gathered at scales that are infeasible to most formal monitoring programs. The identified drivers of debris may also differ from regional and global studies, where monitoring at relevant scales is needed for effective management.
塑料污染带来了环境和社会经济风险,需要政策和管理干预。用于指导管理和评估其有效性的证据基础有限。与公民科学家合作提供了增加监测计划时空尺度的机会,培训和标准化协议为使用数据解决多个假设提供了机会。在这里,我们通过 ReefClean 项目在澳大利亚昆士兰州的 17 个海滩上进行的 168 次调查,提供了跨越 18 纬度的碎片趋势和推断丰度的碎片驱动因素的基线。塑料是主要的材料(总碎片的 87%,其中硬塑料、软塑料和泡沫塑料聚集在一起),尽管回收的碎片与来源的联系有限,因为 67%的物品是碎片。我们测试了特定碎片类型(即塑料、商业捕鱼物品、海上倾倒物品和一次性物品)的潜在驱动因素,并确定了碎片积累与最近人口中心的距离以及地点特征(海滩状态、海滩方位和跨海滩部分)之间的显著关系。管理工作应考虑海滩类型和位置选择中的方位,作为一种机会,可以最大限度地提高回收量,以及其他标准,如碎片对环境、经济和社会价值的风险。本研究表明,公民科学可以通过在大多数正式监测计划难以实现的规模上收集数据,为提供基线和推断碎片驱动因素提供了实用性。碎片的识别驱动因素也可能与区域和全球研究不同,需要在相关尺度上进行监测,以进行有效的管理。