Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, Australia.
School of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Aug;40(8):1669-1686. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2204962. Epub 2023 May 2.
Previous research suggests physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing psychological distress is common; however, there is significant variation in the frequency of such contact.
The study aimed to 1) investigate Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing various forms of psychological distress; 2) identify potential factors that predict perceived frequency of contact; and 3) explore physiotherapists' beliefs regarding their role and self-reported capability to identify and assess psychological distress.
A nationwide online survey of 340 Australian physiotherapists was conducted, and the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and regression analysis.
Physiotherapists' perceived frequencies of contact with psychologically distressed and severely distressed clients expressed as proportions of all clients seen each week were 36.1% and 15.6%, respectively. Factors related to the clinical setting were stronger predictors of the perceived frequency of contact (Cohen's f = 0.16) than factors related to the physiotherapists themselves (Cohen's f = 0.03). Despite believing that identifying psychological distress was within their scope of practice, the physiotherapists in the study felt that assessing and managing this distress fell outside or on the boundary of their scope of practice.
Australian physiotherapists frequently encounter clients they perceive to be experiencing psychological distress. Future research into physiotherapists' capability to assess and respond to client psychological distress, using non-self-reported measures, is required.
先前的研究表明,治疗师普遍认为他们与经历心理困扰的客户的接触频率较高;然而,这种接触的频率存在显著差异。
本研究旨在:1)调查澳大利亚治疗师与经历各种形式心理困扰的客户接触的感知频率;2)确定预测接触感知频率的潜在因素;3)探讨治疗师对其角色的信念以及自我报告识别和评估心理困扰的能力。
对 340 名澳大利亚治疗师进行了一项全国性的在线调查,使用描述性分析和回归分析对数据进行分析。
治疗师感知每周接待的心理困扰和严重困扰客户的比例分别为 36.1%和 15.6%。与治疗师自身相关的因素(科恩氏 f = 0.03)相比,与临床环境相关的因素(科恩氏 f = 0.16)更能预测接触感知频率。尽管治疗师认为识别心理困扰属于其执业范围,但研究中的治疗师认为评估和管理这种困扰超出或处于其执业范围之外。
澳大利亚治疗师经常遇到他们认为经历心理困扰的客户。需要使用非自我报告的措施进一步研究治疗师评估和应对客户心理困扰的能力。