School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Munster, Ireland.
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):628-636. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02412-7. Epub 2023 May 2.
Variability in practice exists in death determination by circulatory criteria in the context of organ donation. We sought to describe the practices of intensive care health care professionals for death determination by circulatory criteria with and without organ donation.
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients with death determination by circulatory criteria in intensive care units at 16 hospitals in Canada, three in the Czech Republic, and one in the Netherlands. Results were recorded using a checklist for the determination of death questionnaire.
A total of 583 patients had their death determination checklist reviewed for statistical analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age in years was 64 (15). Three hundred and fourteen (54.0%) patients were from Canada, 230 (39.5%) were from the Czech Republic, and 38 (6.5%) were from the Netherlands. Fifty-two (8.9%) patients proceeded with donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCD). The most common diagnostic tests reported for the whole group were absent heart sounds by auscultation (81.8%), flat continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) tracing (77.0%), and flat electrocardiogram tracing (73.2%). In patients who successfully underwent DCD (N = 52), death was determined most frequently using a flat continuous ABP tracing (94%), absent pulse oximetry (85%), and absent palpable pulse (77%).
In this study, we have described practices for death determination by circulatory criteria both within and between countries. Though some variability exists, we are reassured that appropriate criteria are almost always used in the context of organ donation. In particular, the use of continuous ABP monitoring in DCD was consistent. It highlights the need for standardization of practice and up to date guidelines, especially within the context of DCD where there is both an ethical and a legal requirement to adhere to the dead donor rule, while minimizing time between death determination and organ procurement.
在器官捐献背景下,循环标准确定死亡的实践存在差异。我们旨在描述重症监护医护人员在有和没有器官捐献的情况下,使用循环标准确定死亡的实践情况。
这是一项前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。我们纳入了在加拿大 16 家医院、捷克共和国 3 家和荷兰 1 家重症监护病房中,根据循环标准确定死亡的患者。结果使用死亡确定检查表进行记录。
共对 583 例患者的死亡确定检查表进行了审查以进行统计分析。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 64(15)岁。314 例(54.0%)患者来自加拿大,230 例(39.5%)来自捷克共和国,38 例(6.5%)来自荷兰。52 例(8.9%)患者在根据循环标准确定死亡后进行了捐献(DCD)。整个组报告的最常见诊断测试为听诊无心音(81.8%)、动脉血压(ABP)连续平坦迹线(77.0%)和心电图连续平坦迹线(73.2%)。在成功进行 DCD 的 52 例患者中(N=52),死亡最常通过平坦连续 ABP 迹线(94%)、无脉搏血氧饱和度(85%)和无可触及脉搏(77%)来确定。
在这项研究中,我们描述了在国家内部和国家之间使用循环标准确定死亡的实践情况。尽管存在一些差异,但我们确信在器官捐献的背景下,几乎总是使用适当的标准。特别是在 DCD 中,连续 ABP 监测的使用是一致的。这强调了标准化实践和最新指南的必要性,特别是在 DCD 背景下,需要遵守死体捐献者规则,同时最大限度地减少从死亡确定到器官获取的时间。