Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):771-780. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02420-7. Epub 2023 May 2.
Radionuclide perfusion studies have an established ancillary role in determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC). While critically important, these examinations are not well understood by individuals outside of the imaging specialties. The purpose of this review is to clarify relevant concepts and nomenclature and provide a lexicon of relevant terminology of value to non-nuclear medicine practitioners who wish to better understand these examinations. Radionuclides were first employed to evaluate cerebral blood flow in 1969. Radionuclide DNC examinations that use lipophobic radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) entail a flow phase followed immediately by blood pool images. On flow imaging, presence of intracranial activity within the arterial vasculature is scrutinized following arrival of the RP bolus into the neck. Lipophilic RPs designed for functional brain imaging were introduced to nuclear medicine in the 1980s and were engineered to cross the blood-brain-barrier and be retained in the parenchyma. The lipophilic RP Tc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) was first used as an ancillary investigation in DNC in 1986. Examinations using lipophilic RPs entail both flow and parenchymal phase images. According to some guidelines, parenchymal phase uptake should be assessed by tomographic imaging, while other investigators consider simple planar imaging sufficient. Findings of perfusion on either the flow or parenchymal phase of the examination effectively precludes DNC. If the flow phase is omitted or somehow compromised, the parenchymal phase remains sufficient for DNC. A priori, parenchymal phase imaging is superior to flow phase imaging for several reasons and lipophilic RPs are favoured over lipophobic RPs in that both flow and parenchymal phase imaging are performed. Disadvantages of lipophilic RPs are increased cost and the need to procure them from a central laboratory, which can prove difficult, especially outside usual working hours. According to most current guidelines, both lipophilic and lipophobic RP categories are acceptable for use in ancillary investigations in DNC, with a growing overt preference for studies using the lipophilic RPs based on their ability to capture the parenchymal phase. The new adult and pediatric Canadian recommendations favour use of lipophilic RPs to variable degrees, specifically Tc-HMPAO, the lipophilic moiety which has undergone the greatest validation. Although ancillary use of radiopharmaceuticals is quite settled in multiple DNC guidelines and best practices, several areas of further research remain open to investigation. Examens auxiliaires de perfusion nucléaire pour la détermination du décès selon des critères neurologiques : méthodes, interprétation et lexique-un guide de l'utilisateur à l'intention du clinicien.
放射性核素灌注研究在通过神经标准确定死亡(DNC)方面具有辅助作用。虽然这些检查非常重要,但对于影像学专业以外的人来说,它们并不是很容易理解。本综述的目的是澄清相关概念和命名,并提供对希望更好地理解这些检查的非核医学从业者有用的相关术语词汇。放射性核素于 1969 年首次用于评估脑血流。使用疏水性放射性药物(RP)的放射性核素 DNC 检查包括一个血流相,随后立即进行血池图像。在血流成像中,在放射性药物进入颈部后,仔细检查颅内活动是否存在于动脉脉管系统中。设计用于功能性脑成像的亲脂性放射性药物于 20 世纪 80 年代引入核医学,并设计成能够穿过血脑屏障并保留在实质中。亲脂性放射性药物 Tc-六甲基丙烯酰胺肟(Tc-HMPAO)于 1986 年首次作为 DNC 的辅助检查使用。使用亲脂性放射性药物的检查包括血流相和实质相图像。根据一些指南,实质相摄取应通过断层成像进行评估,而其他研究人员则认为简单的平面成像就足够了。检查的血流相或实质相的灌注有效排除 DNC。如果省略血流相或血流相受到某种损害,则实质相仍然足以进行 DNC。根据几个原因,实质相成像优于血流相成像,亲脂性放射性药物优于疏水性放射性药物,因为两者都可以进行血流相和实质相成像。亲脂性放射性药物的缺点是成本增加,并且需要从中央实验室获得它们,这可能很困难,尤其是在正常工作时间之外。根据大多数现行指南,亲脂性和疏水性放射性药物类别都可用于 DNC 的辅助检查,由于亲脂性放射性药物能够捕获实质相,因此越来越倾向于使用基于亲脂性放射性药物的研究。新的加拿大成人和儿科建议在一定程度上倾向于使用亲脂性放射性药物,特别是亲脂性部分经历了最大验证的 Tc-HMPAO。尽管放射性药物的辅助使用在多项 DNC 指南和最佳实践中已经相当成熟,但仍有几个领域有待进一步研究。