Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Jun;97(6):1649-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03512-5. Epub 2023 May 4.
Organotin chemicals (butyltins and phenyltins) are the most widely used organometallic chemicals worldwide and are used in industrial applications, such as biocides and anti-fouling paints. Tributyltin (TBT) and more recently, dibutyltin (DBT) and triphenyltin (TPT) have been reported to stimulate adipogenic differentiation. Although these chemicals co-exist in the environment, their effect in combination remains unknown. We first investigated the adipogenic effect of eight organotin chemicals (monobutyltin (MBT), DBT, TBT, tetrabutyltin (TeBT), monophenyltin (MPT), diphenyltin (DPT), TPT, and tin chloride (SnCl)) in the 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cell line in single exposures at two doses (10 and 50 ng/ml). Only three out of the eight organotins induced adipogenic differentiation with TBT eliciting the strongest adipogenic differentiation (in a dose-dependent manner) followed by TPT and DBT, as demonstrated by lipid accumulation and gene expression. We then hypothesized that, in combination (TBT, DBT, and TPT), adipogenic effects will be exacerbated compared to single exposures. However, at the higher dose (50 ng/ml), TBT-induced differentiation was reduced by TPT and DBT when in dual or triple combination. We tested whether TPT or DBT would interfere with adipogenic differentiation stimulated by a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) agonist (rosiglitazone) or a glucocorticoid receptor agonist (dexamethasone). Both DBT50 and TPT50 reduced rosiglitazone-, but not dexamethasone-stimulated adipogenic differentiation. In conclusion, DBT and TPT interfere with TBT's adipogenic differentiation possibly via PPARγ signaling. These findings highlight the antagonistic effects among organotins and the need to understand the effects and mechanism of action of complex organotin mixtures on adipogenic outcomes.
有机锡化合物(丁基锡和苯基锡)是全球应用最广泛的有机金属化合物,用于工业应用,如杀生剂和防污涂料。三丁基锡(TBT)和最近的二丁基锡(DBT)和三苯基锡(TPT)已被报道可刺激脂肪生成分化。尽管这些化学物质在环境中共存,但它们的联合作用仍不清楚。我们首先在两个剂量(10 和 50ng/ml)下,在 3T3-L1 前脂肪细胞系中单暴露研究了八种有机锡化合物(一丁基锡(MBT)、DBT、TBT、四丁基锡(TeBT)、一苯基锡(MPT)、二苯基锡(DPT)、TPT 和氯化锡(SnCl))对脂肪生成的影响。只有其中三种有机锡能诱导脂肪生成分化,其中 TBT 诱导的脂肪生成分化最强(呈剂量依赖性),其次是 TPT 和 DBT,这表现为脂质积累和基因表达。然后,我们假设在联合暴露(TBT、DBT 和 TPT)时,与单一暴露相比,脂肪生成作用会加剧。然而,在较高剂量(50ng/ml)下,当 TBT 与 TPT 或 DBT 双重或三重组合时,TBT 诱导的分化会减少。我们测试了 TPT 或 DBT 是否会干扰过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPARγ)激动剂(罗格列酮)或糖皮质激素受体激动剂(地塞米松)刺激的脂肪生成分化。DBT50 和 TPT50 均降低了罗格列酮而非地塞米松刺激的脂肪生成分化。总之,DBT 和 TPT 通过 PPARγ 信号干扰 TBT 的脂肪生成分化。这些发现强调了有机锡之间的拮抗作用,需要了解复杂有机锡混合物对脂肪生成结果的影响和作用机制。