Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Prostate. 2023 Aug;83(11):1001-1010. doi: 10.1002/pros.24551. Epub 2023 May 7.
Locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary external beam radiotherapy without distant metastasis is a challenging problem, with no current consensus on the optimal management of these patients. Traditional whole-gland salvage treatments offered up to a 50% 5-year disease-free survival rate but with troubling levels of risk for significant complications. Recent progress in advanced imaging techniques has allowed a more accurate selection of patients with local-only recurrence and a selection of patients that may be suitable for newer partial-gland salvage treatments that may reduce late complications.
This article reviews advances in patient selection and provides an overview of whole- and partial-gland salvage results from selected recent meta-analyses, multi-institutional series, and studies from centers of excellence for these treatment approaches.
Salvage radical prostatectomy produces 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates in the 50%-60% range with severe gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in < 2% but severe genitourinary (GU) toxicity in 15%-23% of patients. The whole-gland options of high and low dose rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy appear to offer similar 5-year control rates, with low severe GU and GI toxicity rates of 4%-8% and <2%, respectively. Cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) offer similar 5-year RFS rates but carry significant risks for severe GU and GI toxicity in the range of 10%-27% and <2%, respectively. Early results of partial-gland salvage techniques in selected patients appear promising, with 3-year RFS rates of 48%-72% and rare grade 3 toxicity.
It is important to understand the relative effectiveness and risks of the various treatment options to effectively counsel patients who face this distressing clinical situation. Whole-gland salvage options offer the possibility of long-term control but with significant risks of severe toxicity. Emerging data for the partial-gland salvage options in appropriately selected patients may offer hope of reasonable control rates with reduced severe toxicity.
原发外照射放疗后局部复发性前列腺癌且无远处转移是一个具有挑战性的问题,目前对于这些患者的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。传统的全腺体挽救治疗可提供高达 50%的 5 年无病生存率,但存在严重并发症的风险。先进的影像学技术的最新进展使得能够更准确地选择局部复发的患者,并选择可能适合新的部分腺体挽救治疗的患者,这些治疗方法可能会降低晚期并发症的风险。
本文综述了患者选择方面的进展,并对来自选定的近期荟萃分析、多机构系列和这些治疗方法的卓越中心的研究的全腺体和部分腺体挽救结果进行了概述。
挽救性根治性前列腺切除术可产生 5 年无复发生存率(RFS),在 50%-60%范围内,严重胃肠道(GI)毒性发生率<2%,但严重泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性发生率为 15%-23%。高剂量率和低剂量率近距离放疗和立体定向体部放疗的全腺体治疗选择似乎提供了相似的 5 年控制率,严重 GU 和 GI 毒性发生率分别为 4%-8%和<2%。冷冻疗法和高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)提供了相似的 5 年 RFS 率,但严重 GU 和 GI 毒性的风险分别为 10%-27%和<2%。在选定的患者中,部分腺体挽救技术的早期结果令人鼓舞,3 年 RFS 率为 48%-72%,且罕见 3 级毒性。
了解各种治疗方法的相对有效性和风险对于有效咨询面临这种痛苦临床情况的患者非常重要。全腺体挽救治疗方法有获得长期控制的可能性,但严重毒性的风险很高。在适当选择的患者中,部分腺体挽救治疗方法的新兴数据可能为降低严重毒性的情况下获得合理的控制率带来希望。