Chen Chunlan, Tian Peng, Zhong Jiangshan, Fan Xianming
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 19;13:1151769. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151769. eCollection 2023.
Many clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been initiated, but the conclusions of these trials are not identical. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively collect these randomized clinical controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases, to find relevant studies published until October 2022.RevMan 5.4 software was used for statistical analysis. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. The primary outcome of this study was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), all grand AEs (AEs), and ≥ 3 grand adverse events (≥ 3 AEs).
A total of 780 articles were obtained in the initial examination, which was screened by layer and finally included 8 studies including 3367 patients. Six studies evaluated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Adebrelimab, Serpulimab) combined with chemotherapy, and two studies evaluated the efficacy of CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab) in combination with chemotherapy. The results showed that compared to chemotherapy alone, ICIs combined with chemotherapy significantly improved patients' OS (HR=0.8, 95% CI (0.72-0.85), P<0.05), PFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.63-0.83), P < 0.05), and ORR(RR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13, P<0.05), but patients would experience more any grand AEs and ≥3 grand AEs. Subgroup analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 group performed better than the CTLA-4 group in both efficacy and safety. And ICIs plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS in patients regardless of age, gender, and performance status.
The addition of ICIs to chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in both PFS and OS for patients with ES-SCLC, but patients would experience more AEs.
多项免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的临床试验已经启动,但这些试验的结论并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在全面收集这些随机临床对照试验(RCT),以评估ICI联合化疗一线治疗ES-SCLC的疗效和安全性。
我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和ClinicalTrials数据库,以查找截至2022年10月发表的相关研究。采用RevMan 5.4软件进行统计分析。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。本研究的主要结局是总生存期(OS),次要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、所有严重不良事件(AE)和≥3级严重不良事件(≥3AE)。
初步检索共获得780篇文章,经逐层筛选,最终纳入8项研究,共3367例患者。6项研究评估了PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(帕博利珠单抗、纳武利尤单抗、阿替利珠单抗、度伐利尤单抗、阿得贝利单抗、斯鲁利单抗)联合化疗的疗效,2项研究评估了CTLA-4抑制剂(伊匹木单抗)联合化疗的疗效。结果显示,与单纯化疗相比,ICI联合化疗显著改善了患者的OS(HR=0.8,95%CI(0.72-0.85),P<0.05)、PFS(HR = 0.72,95%CI(0.63-0.83),P < 0.05)和ORR(RR=1.08,95%CI:1.03-1.13,P<0.05),但患者会经历更多的任何严重AE和≥3级严重AE。亚组分析显示,PD-1/PD-L1组在疗效和安全性方面均优于CTLA-4组。并且ICI联合化疗在年龄、性别和体能状态不同的患者中均显著改善了OS和PFS。
ICI联合化疗可显著改善ES-SCLC患者的PFS和OS,但患者会经历更多的AE。