Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023 Jun;24(3):365-384. doi: 10.1007/s10162-023-00897-z. Epub 2023 May 8.
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Our previous study (McInturff et al., 2022) showed that single-pulse stimulation of the dorsal (D)CN subdivision with low levels of current evokes responses that have early latencies, different than the late response patterns observed from stimulation of the ventral (V)CN. How these differing responses encode more complex stimuli, such as pulse trains and amplitude modulated (AM) pulses, has not been explored. Here, we compare responses to pulse train stimulation of the DCN and VCN, and show that VCN responses, measured in the inferior colliculus (IC), have less adaption, higher synchrony, and higher cross-correlation. However, with high-level DCN stimulation, responses become like those to VCN stimulation, supporting our earlier hypothesis that current spreads from electrodes on the DCN to excite neurons located in the VCN. To AM pulses, stimulation of the VCN elicits responses with larger vector strengths and gain values especially in the high-CF portion of the IC. Additional analysis using neural measures of modulation thresholds indicate that these measures are lowest for VCN. Human ABI users with low modulation thresholds, who score best on comprehension tests, may thus have electrode arrays that stimulate the VCN. Overall, the results show that the VCN has superior response characteristics and suggest that it should be the preferred target for ABI electrode arrays in humans.
听觉脑干植入物 (ABI) 是一种听觉神经假体,通过电刺激脑干的耳蜗核 (CN) 来提供听觉。我们之前的研究(McInturff 等人,2022 年)表明,用低电流刺激背侧 (D)CN 亚区的单脉冲刺激会引起潜伏期较早的反应,与从腹侧 (V)CN 刺激观察到的晚期反应模式不同。这些不同的反应如何对更复杂的刺激(如脉冲串和调幅 (AM) 脉冲)进行编码尚未探索。在这里,我们比较了 DCN 和 VCN 的脉冲串刺激反应,并表明 VCN 反应,在下丘 (IC) 中测量,具有较低的适应能力、更高的同步性和更高的互相关。然而,随着 DCN 高水平刺激,反应变得类似于 VCN 刺激,这支持了我们之前的假设,即电流从 DCN 上的电极传播,以兴奋位于 VCN 的神经元。对于 AM 脉冲,刺激 VCN 会引起更大的向量强度和增益值的反应,尤其是在 IC 的高 CF 部分。使用神经调制阈值的额外分析表明,这些措施对于 VCN 最低。具有低调制阈值的人类 ABI 用户,在理解测试中得分最高,因此他们的电极阵列可能会刺激 VCN。总体而言,结果表明 VCN 具有优越的反应特征,并表明它应该是人类 ABI 电极阵列的首选目标。