Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Ultrasound Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Oct;42(10):2247-2255. doi: 10.1002/jum.16242. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
The primary aim was to estimate the influence of various depths on ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) of multiple vendors in the liver. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of region of interest (ROI) size on AC measurements in a subset of participants.
This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective study was carried out in two centers using AC-Canon and AC-Philips algorithms and extracting AC-Siemens values from ultrasound-derived fat fraction algorithm. Measurements were performed positioning ROI upper edge (3 cm size) at 2, 3, 4, 5 cm from the liver capsule with AC-Canon and AC-Philips and at 1.5, 2, 3 cm with Siemens algorithm. In a subset of participants, measurements were obtained with 1 and 3 cm ROI size. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used for statistical analysis as appropriate.
Three different cohorts were studied. Sixty-three participants (34 females; mean age: 51 ± 14 years) were studied with AC-Canon, 60 (46 females; mean age: 57 ± 11 years) with AC-Philips, and 50 (25 females; 61 ± 13 years) with AC-Siemens. There was a decrease in AC values per 1 cm increase in depth in all. In multivariable analysis, the coefficient was -0.049 (-0.060; -0.038 P < .001) with AC-Canon, -0.058 (-0.066; -0.049 P < .001) with AC-Philips and -0.081 (-0.112; -0.050 P < .001) with AC-Siemens. AC values with 1 cm ROI were significantly higher than those obtained with 3 cm ROI at all depths (P < .001) but the agreement between AC values obtained with different ROI size was excellent (CCC 0.82 [0.77-0.88]).
There is depth dependence in AC measurement that affects results. A standardized protocol with fixed ROI's depth and size is needed.
本研究的主要目的是评估不同深度对多个供应商肝脏内超声衰减系数(AC)的影响。次要目的是评估在部分参与者中,感兴趣区域(ROI)大小对 AC 测量的影响。
本研究经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)规定,在两个中心进行,使用 AC-Canon 和 AC-Philips 算法,并从超声衍生的脂肪分数算法中提取 AC-Siemens 值。使用 AC-Canon 和 AC-Philips 算法,在距肝包膜 2、3、4、5cm 处定位 ROI 上边缘(3cm 大小),使用 Siemens 算法在 1.5、2、3cm 处进行测量。在部分参与者中,使用 1cm 和 3cm ROI 大小进行测量。使用单变量和多变量线性回归模型和 Lin 的一致性相关系数(CCC)进行适当的统计分析。
研究了三个不同的队列。63 名参与者(34 名女性;平均年龄:51±14 岁)接受了 AC-Canon 检查,60 名参与者(46 名女性;平均年龄:57±11 岁)接受了 AC-Philips 检查,50 名参与者(25 名女性;61±13 岁)接受了 AC-Siemens 检查。所有组的 AC 值均随深度每增加 1cm 而降低。多变量分析中,AC-Canon 的系数为-0.049(-0.060;-0.038 P<.001),AC-Philips 为-0.058(-0.066;-0.049 P<.001),AC-Siemens 为-0.081(-0.112;-0.050 P<.001)。在所有深度,1cm ROI 的 AC 值均显著高于 3cm ROI 的 AC 值(P<.001),但不同 ROI 大小获得的 AC 值之间的一致性非常好(CCC 0.82 [0.77-0.88])。
AC 测量存在深度依赖性,会影响结果。需要制定具有固定 ROI 深度和大小的标准化方案。