Division of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Healthcare Division, RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):620-631. doi: 10.1055/a-2090-5745. Epub 2023 May 10.
This study aimed to assess a multipronged strategy using primarily digital methods to equitably recruit asthma patients into a clinical trial of a digital health intervention.
We approached eligible patients using at least one of eight recruitment strategies. We recorded approach dates and the strategy that led to completion of a web-based eligibility questionnaire that was reported during the verbal consent phone call. Study team members conducted monthly sessions using a structured guide to identify recruitment barriers and facilitators. The proportion of participants who reported being recruited by a portal or nonportal strategy was measured as our outcomes. We used Fisher's exact test to compare outcomes by equity variable, and multivariable logistic regression to control for each covariate and adjust effect size estimates. Using grounded theory, we coded and extracted themes regarding recruitment barriers and facilitators.
The majority (84.4%) of patients who met study inclusion criteria were patient portal enrollees. Of 6,366 eligible patients who were approached, 627 completed the eligibility questionnaire and were less frequently Hispanic, less frequently Spanish-speaking, and more frequently patient portal enrollees. Of 445 patients who consented to participate, 241 (54.2%) reported completing the eligibility questionnaire after being contacted by a patient portal message. In adjusted analysis, only race (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.77, = 0.003) and college education (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91, = 0.016) remained significant. Key recruitment barriers included technology issues (e.g., lack of email access) and facilitators included bilingual study staff, Spanish-language recruitment materials, targeted phone calls, and clinician-initiated "1-click" referrals.
A primarily digital strategy to recruit patients into a digital health trial is unlikely to achieve equitable participation, even in a population overrepresented by patient portal enrollees. Nondigital recruitment methods that address racial and educational disparities and less active portal enrollees are necessary to ensure equity in clinical trial enrollment.
本研究旨在评估一种多管齐下的策略,主要采用数字方法公平地招募哮喘患者参加一项数字健康干预的临床试验。
我们使用至少八种招募策略来接触符合条件的患者。我们记录了联系方式和导致完成基于网络的合格性问卷的策略,该问卷是在口头同意电话中报告的。研究小组成员每月使用结构化指南进行会议,以确定招募障碍和促进因素。通过门户或非门户策略招募的参与者比例作为我们的结果进行衡量。我们使用 Fisher 精确检验比较按公平性变量衡量的结果,并使用多变量逻辑回归控制每个协变量并调整效应大小估计值。使用扎根理论,我们对招募障碍和促进因素进行了编码和提取主题。
符合研究纳入标准的大多数(84.4%)患者是患者门户的注册用户。在 6366 名符合条件的患者中,有 627 名完成了资格问卷,他们较少为西班牙裔,较少说西班牙语,并且更多为患者门户的注册用户。在同意参与的 445 名患者中,有 241 名(54.2%)在收到患者门户消息后完成了资格问卷。在调整分析中,只有种族(比值比 [OR]:0.46,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.28-0.77, = 0.003)和大学教育(OR:0.60,95% CI:0.39-0.91, = 0.016)仍然具有统计学意义。关键的招募障碍包括技术问题(例如,缺乏电子邮件访问权限),促进因素包括双语研究人员、西班牙语招募材料、针对性电话以及临床医生发起的“一键”转介。
即使在以患者门户注册用户为主的人群中,主要采用数字方法招募患者参加数字健康试验也不太可能实现公平参与。需要采用非数字招募方法来解决种族和教育差异以及不活跃的门户注册用户问题,以确保临床试验入组的公平性。