Suppr超能文献

潜伏期持续时间及相关结局:一项基于当代人群的观察性研究。

Latent phase duration and associated outcomes: a contemporary, population-based observational study.

机构信息

Department of Nurse-Midwifery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Department of Nurse-Midwifery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1025-S1036.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.003. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the latent phase of labor, including whether its duration influences subsequent labor processes or birth outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the duration of the latent phase of labor from self-report of the onset of painful contractions to a cervical dilation of 5 cm in a large, Swedish population and evaluate the association between the duration of the latent phase of labor and perinatal processes and outcomes that occurred during the active phase of labor, second stage of labor, birth and immediately after delivery, stratified by parity.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a population-based cohort study of 67,267 pregnancies with deliveries between 2008 and 2020 in the Stockholm-Gotland Regions, Sweden. Nulliparous and parous women without a history of cesarean delivery in spontaneous labor with a term (≥37 weeks of gestation), singleton, live, and vertex fetus without major malformations were included. Imputation was used if the notation of the end of the latent phase of labor (ie, cervical dilation of 5 cm) was missing in the partograph. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for potential covariates.

RESULTS

Including the time from painful contraction onset to a cervical dilation of 5 cm, the median durations of the latent phase of labor were 16.0 (interquartile range, 10.0-26.6) hours for nulliparous women and 9.4 (interquartile range, 5.9-15.3) hours for multiparous women. The durations of the latent phase of labor beyond the median were associated with increased odds of labor dystocia diagnosis during the first stage active phase or second stage of labor and interventions commonly associated with dystocia (amniotomy, oxytocin augmentation, epidural, and cesarean delivery). The duration of the latent phase of labor of ≥90th percentile vs less than the median in nulliparous women demonstrated an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes and neonatal intensive care unit admission), chorioamnionitis, and fetal occiput posterior. In multiparous women, longer duration of the latent phase of labor was associated with an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission and chorioamnionitis but was not associated with an Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes. The duration of the latent phase of labor was not associated with additional markers of maternal risk.

CONCLUSION

The duration of the latent phase of labor in nulliparous women was longer than that of multiparous women at each point of distribution. A longer duration of the latent phase of labor was associated with more frequent dystocia diagnoses and related interventions during the first stage active phase or second stage of labor, including cesarean delivery, nulliparous fetal occiput posterior position, chorioamnionitis, and markers of neonatal morbidity. More research is needed to identify potential mediating paths between the duration of the latent phase of labor and neonatal morbidity.

摘要

背景

对于产程潜伏期,我们知之甚少,包括其持续时间是否会影响后续的产程或分娩结局。

目的

本研究旨在描述瑞典大人群中从疼痛宫缩开始到宫颈扩张至 5cm 时的潜伏期持续时间,并评估潜伏期持续时间与活跃期、第二产程、分娩和分娩后即刻发生的围产过程和结局之间的关联,按产次分层。

研究设计

这是一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2008 年至 2020 年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩-哥塔兰地区分娩的 67267 例妊娠。纳入无剖宫产史、自发临产、足月(≥37 周妊娠)、单胎、活胎、头位、无严重畸形的初产妇和经产妇。如果产程图中缺少潜伏期结束(即宫颈扩张至 5cm)的记录,则使用插补法。采用多变量逻辑回归估计关联的调整比值比和 95%置信区间,同时控制潜在的协变量。

结果

包括从疼痛宫缩开始到宫颈扩张至 5cm 的时间,初产妇潜伏期的中位数持续时间为 16.0 小时(四分位间距 10.0-26.6),经产妇为 9.4 小时(四分位间距 5.9-15.3)。超过中位数的潜伏期持续时间与活跃期第一产程或第二产程中劳动困难诊断以及与劳动困难常见相关的干预措施(人工破膜、缩宫素增强、硬膜外麻醉和剖宫产)的几率增加相关。初产妇潜伏期持续时间≥第 90 百分位数与小于中位数相比,新生儿不良结局(5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7 和新生儿重症监护病房入院)、绒毛膜羊膜炎和胎头枕后位的风险增加。在经产妇中,较长的潜伏期持续时间与新生儿重症监护病房入院和绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险增加相关,但与 5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7 无关。潜伏期持续时间与产妇其他风险标志物无关。

结论

在每个分布点,初产妇的潜伏期持续时间都长于经产妇。潜伏期持续时间较长与活跃期第一产程或第二产程中更频繁的劳动困难诊断以及相关干预措施(包括剖宫产、初产妇胎头枕后位、绒毛膜羊膜炎和新生儿发病率标志物)相关。需要进一步研究以确定潜伏期持续时间与新生儿发病率之间的潜在中介途径。

相似文献

1
Latent phase duration and associated outcomes: a contemporary, population-based observational study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1025-S1036.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.003. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Contemporary patterns of labor in nulliparous and multiparous women.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):267.e1-267.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.035. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
5
Labor Dystocia in Nulliparous Women.
Am Fam Physician. 2021 Jan 15;103(2):90-96.
7
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
8
Prevalence of Prolonged Latent Phase and Labor Outcomes: Review of Birth Records in a Swedish Population.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12704.
10
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A salutogenic approach to early labor midwifery care in Denmark, Sweden, and Switzerland: A qualitative study.
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jul 10;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/206921. eCollection 2025.
2
Labor patterns of spontaneous first-stage labor in Chinese women with normal neonatal outcomes.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305243. eCollection 2024.
4
First stage of labour duration and associated risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39480-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations.
Reprod Sci. 2023 Mar;30(3):729-742. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01018-6. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Association between first and second stage of labour duration and mode of delivery: A population-based cohort study.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 May;36(3):358-367. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12848. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
A qualitative study of Norwegian first-time mothers' information needs in pre-admission early labour.
Midwifery. 2021 Sep;100:103016. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103016. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care.
BJOG. 2021 Sep;128(10):1658-1662. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16694. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
First stage progression in women with spontaneous onset of labor: A large population-based cohort study.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239724. eCollection 2020.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following a prolonged second stage of labor: A meta-analysis of observational studies.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Nursing Support During Latent Phase Labor: A Scoping Review.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;45(4):197-207. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000626.
10
Is Zhang the new Friedman: How should we evaluate the first stage of labor?
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Mar;44(2):151215. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2019.151215. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验