Department of General Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Oct;35(5):828-833. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14240. Epub 2023 May 11.
Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) accounts for high rates of ED presentations and hospital admissions. There is increasing evidence to suggest that delaying cardioversion for acute uncomplicated AF is safe, and that many patients will spontaneously revert to sinus rhythm (SR). We conducted a before-and-after evaluation of AF/AFL management after a change in ED pathway using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' approach, incorporating next working day outpatient clinic follow-up and delayed cardioversion if required.
We performed a before-and-after retrospective cohort study examining outcomes for patients who presented to the ED in Christchurch, New Zealand, with acute uncomplicated AF/AFL in the 1-year period before and after the implementation of a new conservative management pathway.
A total of 360 patients were included in the study (182 'Pre-pathway' vs 178 'Post-Pathway'). Compared to the pre-pathway cohort, those managed under the new pathway had an 81.2% reduction in ED cardioversions (n = 32 vs n = 6), and 50.7% reduction in all cardioversions (n = 65 vs n = 32). There was a 31.6% reduction in admissions from ED (n = 54 vs n = 79). ED length of stay (3.9 h vs 3.8 h, net difference -0.1 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6 to 0.3), 1-year ED AF representation (32.4% vs 26.4%, net difference -6.0% [95% CI -16.0% to 3.9%]), 1-year ED ischaemic stroke presentation (2.2% in both groups) and 7-day all-cause mortality rates (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.9]) were all similar.
Using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' strategy with early follow-up for patients presenting to ED with AF/AFL can safely reduce unnecessary cardioversions and avoidable hospitalisations.
心房颤动/扑动(AF/AFL)导致急诊科(ED)就诊率和住院率居高不下。越来越多的证据表明,延迟对急性无并发症的 AF 进行转复是安全的,并且许多患者会自发恢复窦性节律(SR)。我们在改变 ED 路径后,采用保守的“控制心室率和等待”方法,对 AF/AFL 管理进行了前后评估,该方法纳入了次日门诊随访和必要时的延迟转复。
我们进行了一项前后回顾性队列研究,纳入了在新西兰克赖斯特彻奇 ED 就诊的急性无并发症的 AF/AFL 患者,这些患者在实施新的保守治疗路径前后的 1 年期间。
共纳入 360 例患者(182 例“前路径”与 178 例“后路径”)。与前路径组相比,新路径管理组的 ED 电复律减少了 81.2%(n=32 与 n=6),所有电复律减少了 50.7%(n=65 与 n=32)。ED 入院率降低了 31.6%(n=54 与 n=79)。ED 住院时间(3.9 小时与 3.8 小时,净差异-0.1 小时,95%置信区间[CI]-0.6 至 0.3)、1 年 ED 复发性 AF(32.4%与 26.4%,净差异-6.0%[95%CI-16.0%至 3.9%])、1 年 ED 缺血性卒中发作(两组均为 2.2%)和 7 天全因死亡率(风险比 1.05[95%CI 0.6 至 1.9])均相似。
对 ED 就诊的 AF/AFL 患者采用保守的“控制心室率和等待”策略,结合早期随访,可安全减少不必要的电复律和避免住院。