Illumina 与 Oxford Nanopore 技术在分析土拉弗朗西斯菌、炭疽芽孢杆菌和猪布鲁氏菌基因组中的比较。

Comparison of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology for genome analysis of Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis, and Brucella suis.

机构信息

Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Jena, Germany.

Genome Competence Center (MF1), Methodology and Research Infrastructure, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2023 May 12;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09343-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bacterial epidemiology needs to understand the spread and dissemination of strains in a One Health context. This is important for highly pathogenic bacteria such as Bacillus anthracis, Brucella species, and Francisella tularensis. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has paved the way for genetic marker detection and high-resolution genotyping. While such tasks are established for Illumina short-read sequencing, Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read sequencing has yet to be evaluated for such highly pathogenic bacteria with little genomic variations between strains. In this study, three independent sequencing runs were performed using Illumina, ONT flow cell version 9.4.1, and 10.4 for six strains of each of Ba. anthracis, Br. suis and F. tularensis. Data from ONT sequencing alone, Illumina sequencing alone and two hybrid assembly approaches were compared.

RESULTS

As previously shown, ONT produces ultra-long reads, while Illumina produces short reads with higher sequencing accuracy. Flow cell version 10.4 improved sequencing accuracy over version 9.4.1. The correct (sub-)species were inferred from all tested technologies, individually. Moreover, the sets of genetic markers for virulence, were almost identical for the respective species. The long reads of ONT allowed to assemble not only chromosomes of all species to near closure, but also virulence plasmids of Ba. anthracis. Assemblies based on nanopore data alone, Illumina data alone, and both hybrid assemblies correctly detected canonical (sub-)clades for Ba. anthracis and F. tularensis as well as multilocus sequence types for Br. suis. For F. tularensis, high-resolution genotyping using core-genome MLST (cgMLST) and core-genome Single-Nucleotide-Polymorphism (cgSNP) typing produced highly comparable results between data from Illumina and both ONT flow cell versions. For Ba. anthracis, only data from flow cell version 10.4 produced similar results to Illumina for both high-resolution typing methods. However, for Br. suis, high-resolution genotyping yielded larger differences comparing Illumina data to data from both ONT flow cell versions.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, combining data from ONT and Illumina for high-resolution genotyping might be feasible for F. tularensis and Ba. anthracis, but not yet for Br. suis. The ongoing improvement of nanopore technology and subsequent data analysis may facilitate high-resolution genotyping for all bacteria with highly stable genomes in future.

摘要

背景

细菌流行病学需要了解在“同一健康”背景下菌株的传播和扩散。这对于炭疽杆菌、布鲁氏菌属和土拉弗朗西斯菌等高致病性细菌非常重要。全基因组测序(WGS)为遗传标记检测和高分辨率基因分型铺平了道路。虽然 Illumina 短读测序已经建立了此类任务,但对于基因组变异较小的高致病性细菌,Oxford Nanopore Technology(ONT)长读测序尚未得到评估。在这项研究中,使用 Illumina、ONT 流动池版本 9.4.1 和 10.4 对炭疽杆菌、猪布鲁氏菌和土拉弗朗西斯菌的每种菌株进行了三次独立的测序。比较了单独的 ONT 测序、单独的 Illumina 测序和两种混合组装方法的数据。

结果

正如之前所示,ONT 产生超长读长,而 Illumina 产生具有更高测序准确性的短读长。与版本 9.4.1 相比,流动池版本 10.4 提高了测序准确性。从所有测试技术中,都可以单独推断出正确的(亚)种。此外,用于毒力的遗传标记集对于各自的物种几乎完全相同。ONT 的长读长不仅可以将所有物种的染色体组装到几乎接近完整,还可以组装炭疽杆菌的毒力质粒。基于纳米孔数据的单独组装、Illumina 数据的单独组装以及两者的混合组装都正确地检测到炭疽杆菌和土拉弗朗西斯菌的典型(亚)分支以及猪布鲁氏菌的多位点序列类型。对于土拉弗朗西斯菌,使用核心基因组多位点序列分型(cgMLST)和核心基因组单核苷酸多态性(cgSNP)分型的高分辨率基因分型在 Illumina 数据和两种 ONT 流动池版本的数据之间产生了非常相似的结果。对于炭疽杆菌,只有来自流动池版本 10.4 的数据对于两种高分辨率分型方法都产生了与 Illumina 相似的结果。然而,对于猪布鲁氏菌,与 Illumina 数据相比,来自两种 ONT 流动池版本的数据产生了更大的高分辨率基因分型差异。

结论

总的来说,对于土拉弗朗西斯菌和炭疽杆菌,将 ONT 和 Illumina 的数据结合进行高分辨率基因分型可能是可行的,但对于猪布鲁氏菌则不行。纳米孔技术的不断改进和随后的数据分析可能会促进未来具有高度稳定基因组的所有细菌的高分辨率基因分型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d07f/10182678/3b2923325193/12864_2023_9343_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索