Division of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 N Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2362-2374. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14401. Epub 2023 May 12.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is widely used for evaluating organ perfusion, but its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) remains poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between MAP and all-cause mortality and readmission in patients with HF.
We retrospectively analysed data from PhysioNet, involving 2005 patients with HF admitted to Zigong Fourth People's Hospital between 2016 and 2019. The primary outcomes were composite outcomes of all-cause mortality and readmission at 3 and 6 months. The secondary outcomes were readmission at 3 and 6 months. Multivariate-adjusted Cox regression models, restricted cubic spline curves (RCS), and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to explore the relationship between MAP and clinical outcomes. Among 2005 patients with HF [≥70 years, 1460 (72.8%); male, 843 (42.0%)], the incidence of primary outcome at 3 months was 33.4% (223/668), 24.4% (163/668), and 22.7% (152/669), and at 6 months, it was 47.5% (317/668), 38.5% (257/668), and 38.0% (254/669) across MAP tertiles [from Tertile 1 (T1) to Tertile 3 (T3)], respectively. The RCS showed an 'L-shaped' relationship between MAP and primary or secondary endpoints. Multivariate-adjusted Cox models showed that a higher MAP was significantly associated with a lower risk of composite endpoints at 3 months [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.92, P = 0.006, Tertile 2 (T2); aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, P = 0.001, T3] and 6 months (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93, P = 0.005, T2; aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.91, P = 0.003, T3) compared with T1. After 1:1 PSM, the effect of maintaining a relatively higher MAP was slightly attenuated. Threshold analyses indicated that per 10 mmHg increase in MAP, there was a 21% and 14% decrease in composite endpoints at 3 and 6 months, respectively (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91, P = 0.001), and 6 months (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97, P = 0.013) in patients with MAP ≤ 93 mmHg. The associations were consistent in readmission (secondary outcomes), various subgroups, and sensitivity analysis.
A higher MAP was associated with a lower risk of a composite of all-cause mortality and readmission. Maintaining a relatively higher MAP could potentially improve the clinical prognosis for patients with HF.
平均动脉压(MAP)广泛用于评估器官灌注,但它对心力衰竭(HF)患者临床结局的影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨 MAP 与 HF 患者全因死亡率和再入院之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 PhysioNet 数据,共纳入 2016 年至 2019 年自贡市第四人民医院收治的 2005 例 HF 患者。主要结局为全因死亡率和再入院的复合结局,分别在 3 个月和 6 个月时发生。次要结局为 3 个月和 6 个月时的再入院。采用多变量调整 Cox 回归模型、限制性立方样条曲线(RCS)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)来探讨 MAP 与临床结局之间的关系。在 2005 例 HF 患者中[≥70 岁,1460 例(72.8%);男性,843 例(42.0%)],3 个月时主要结局的发生率为 33.4%(223/668)、24.4%(163/668)和 22.7%(152/669),6 个月时的发生率分别为 47.5%(317/668)、38.5%(257/668)和 38.0%(254/669),MAP 三分位数[从三分位数 1(T1)到三分位数 3(T3)]呈“L”形。RCS 显示 MAP 与主要或次要终点之间存在“L”形关系。多变量调整 Cox 模型显示,较高的 MAP 与 3 个月时复合终点的风险降低显著相关[调整后的危险比(aHR)0.75,95%置信区间(CI)0.61-0.92,P=0.006,T2;aHR 0.69,95%CI 0.56-0.86,P=0.001,T3]和 6 个月时(aHR 0.79,95%CI 0.67-0.93,P=0.005,T2;aHR 0.77,95%CI 0.64-0.91,P=0.003,T3)与 T1 相比。1:1 PSM 后,维持相对较高 MAP 的效果略有减弱。阈值分析表明,MAP 每增加 10mmHg,3 个月和 6 个月时复合终点的风险分别降低 21%和 14%(aHR 0.79,95%CI 0.69-0.91,P=0.001)和 6 个月(aHR 0.86,95%CI 0.77-0.97,P=0.013),MAP≤93mmHg 的患者。在再入院(次要结局)、各种亚组和敏感性分析中,这些关联是一致的。
较高的 MAP 与全因死亡率和再入院的复合风险降低相关。维持相对较高的 MAP 可能有助于改善 HF 患者的临床预后。