Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center and the Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., T.D.).
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jun;176(6):827-835. doi: 10.7326/M23-0570. Epub 2023 May 16.
Optimal use of masks for preventing COVID-19 is unclear.
To update an evidence synthesis on N95, surgical, and cloth mask effectiveness in community and health care settings for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, medRxiv (3 June 2022 to 2 January 2023), and reference lists.
Randomized trials of interventions to increase mask use and risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and observational studies of mask use that controlled for potential confounders.
Two investigators sequentially abstracted study data and rated quality.
Three randomized trials and 21 observational studies were included. In community settings, mask use may be associated with a small reduced risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection versus no mask use, on the basis of 2 randomized trials and 7 observational studies. In routine patient care settings, surgical masks and N95 respirators may be associated with similar risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, on the basis of 1 new randomized trial with some imprecision and 4 observational studies. Evidence from observational studies was insufficient to evaluate other mask comparisons due to methodological limitations and inconsistency.
Few randomized trials, studies had methodological limitations and some imprecision, suboptimal adherence and pragmatic aspects of randomized trials potentially attenuated benefits, very limited evidence on harms, uncertain applicability to Omicron variant predominant era, meta-analysis not done due to heterogeneity, unable to formally assess for publication bias, and restricted to English-language articles.
Updated evidence suggests that masks may be associated with a small reduction in risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in community settings. Surgical masks and N95 respirators may be associated with similar infection risk in routine patient care settings, but a beneficial effect of N95 respirators cannot be ruled out.
None.
对于预防 COVID-19,口罩的最佳使用方法尚不清楚。
更新关于 N95、外科和布制口罩在社区和医疗保健环境中预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效性的证据综合。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、medRxiv(2022 年 6 月 3 日至 2023 年 1 月 2 日)和参考文献列表。
旨在增加口罩使用和 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险的干预措施的随机试验以及控制了潜在混杂因素的口罩使用的观察性研究。
两名调查员依次提取研究数据并对质量进行评分。
共纳入了 3 项随机试验和 21 项观察性研究。基于 2 项随机试验和 7 项观察性研究,在社区环境中,与不戴口罩相比,戴口罩可能与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险略有降低相关。在常规患者护理环境中,基于 1 项新的随机试验存在一定的不精确性和 4 项观察性研究,外科口罩和 N95 呼吸器可能与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险相似。由于方法学限制和不一致性,观察性研究的证据不足以评估其他口罩比较。
随机试验数量较少,研究存在方法学限制和一定程度的不精确性,随机试验中依从性和实用性方面的问题可能会降低获益,关于危害的证据非常有限,对奥密克戎变异株为主的时代的适用性不确定,由于异质性,未进行荟萃分析,无法正式评估发表偏倚,且仅限于英文文章。
最新证据表明,口罩在社区环境中可能与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险略有降低相关。在常规患者护理环境中,外科口罩和 N95 呼吸器可能与相似的感染风险相关,但不能排除 N95 呼吸器的有益效果。
无。