Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 May 17;13(1):7993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31301-8.
Current assessments of interocular interactions in amblyopia often use rivalrous stimuli, with conflicting stimuli in each eye, which does not reflect vision under typical circumstances. Here we measure interocular interactions in observers with amblyopia, strabismus with equal vision, and controls using a non-rivalrous stimulus. Observers used a joystick to continuously report the perceived binocular contrast of dichoptic grating stimuli, identical except that the stimulus was contrast-modulated independently in each eye over time. Consistent with previous studies, a model predicting the time-course of perceived contrast found increased amblyopic eye attenuation, and reduced contrast normalization of the fellow eye by the amblyopic eye, in amblyopic participants compared to controls. However, these suppressive interocular effects were weaker than those found in previous studies, suggesting that rivalrous stimuli may overestimate the effects of amblyopia on interocular interactions during naturalistic viewing conditions.
目前对弱视的双眼相互作用的评估通常使用竞争性刺激,即每只眼睛都有相互冲突的刺激,这与典型情况下的视觉并不相符。在这里,我们使用非竞争性刺激来测量弱视、斜视和正常视力观察者的双眼相互作用。观察者使用操纵杆连续报告双眼光栅刺激的感知对比,这些刺激除了在时间上每个眼睛的刺激对比度独立调制外完全相同。与之前的研究一致,一个预测感知对比时间进程的模型发现,与对照组相比,弱视参与者的弱视眼衰减增加,以及弱视眼对正常眼的对比归一化减少。然而,这些抑制性的双眼相互作用效应比之前的研究发现的要弱,这表明在自然观看条件下,竞争性刺激可能高估了弱视对双眼相互作用的影响。