Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314211. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14211.
IMPORTANCE: Rising prescription drug costs and increasing prices for consumer goods may increase cost-related medication nonadherence. Cost-conscious prescribing can be supported by real-time benefit tools, but patient views on real-time benefit tool use and their potential benefits and harms are largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To assess older adults' cost-related medication nonadherence, cost-coping strategies, and views on the use of real-time benefit tools in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A weighted, nationally representative survey of adults aged 65 years and older administered via the internet and telephone from June 2022 to September 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost-related medication nonadherence; cost coping strategies; desire for cost conversations; potential benefits and harms from real-time benefit tool use. RESULTS: Among 2005 respondents, most were female (54.7%) and partnered (59.7%); 40.4% were 75 years or older. Cost-related medication nonadherence was reported by 20.2% of participants. Some respondents used extreme forms of cost-coping, including foregoing basic needs (8.5%) or going into debt (4.8%) to afford medications. Of respondents, 89.0% reported being comfortable or neutral about being screened before a physician's visit for wanting to have medication cost conversations and 89.5% indicated a desire for their physician to use a real-time benefit tool. Respondents expressed concern if prices were inaccurate, with 49.9% of those with cost-related nonadherence and 39.3% of those without reporting they would be extremely upset if their actual medication price was more than what their physician estimated with a real-time benefit tool. If the actual price was much more than the estimated real-time benefit tool price, nearly 80% of respondents with cost-related nonadherence reported that it would affect their decision to start or keep taking a medication. Furthermore, 54.2% of those with any cost-related nonadherence and 30% of those without reported they would be moderately or extremely upset if their physicians used a medication price tool but chose not to discuss prices with them. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In 2022, approximately 1 in 5 older adults reported cost-related nonadherence. Real-time benefit tools may support medication cost conversations and cost-conscious prescribing, and patients are enthusiastic about their use. However, if disclosed prices are inaccurate, there is potential for harm through loss of confidence in the physician and nonadherence to prescribed medications.
重要性:不断上涨的处方药成本和消费品价格可能会增加与成本相关的药物不依从性。实时效益工具可以支持有成本意识的处方,但患者对实时效益工具使用及其潜在益处和危害的看法在很大程度上尚未得到探索。 目的:评估老年人与成本相关的药物不依从性、成本应对策略以及他们对临床实践中实时效益工具使用的看法。 设计、设置和参与者:这是一项通过互联网和电话于 2022 年 6 月至 9 月进行的、针对 65 岁及以上成年人的加权、全国代表性调查。 主要结果和措施:与成本相关的药物不依从性;成本应对策略;进行成本对话的愿望;实时效益工具使用的潜在益处和危害。 结果:在 2005 名受访者中,大多数是女性(54.7%)和已婚(59.7%);40.4%的人年龄在 75 岁或以上。20.2%的参与者报告存在与成本相关的药物不依从性。一些受访者采取了极端的成本应对方式,包括放弃基本需求(8.5%)或负债(4.8%)来支付药物费用。89.0%的受访者表示,在医生就诊前进行药物费用对话的筛查感到舒适或中立,89.5%的受访者表示希望医生使用实时效益工具。受访者对价格不准确表示担忧,如果实际药物价格高于实时效益工具估计价格,49.9%的有成本相关不依从性的受访者和 39.3%的没有不依从性的受访者表示会非常不安。如果实际价格远高于实时效益工具估计价格,近 80%的有成本相关不依从性的受访者表示这将影响他们开始或继续服用药物的决定。此外,54.2%的有任何成本相关不依从性的受访者和 30%的没有不依从性的受访者表示,如果医生使用药物价格工具但选择不与他们讨论价格,他们会感到中度或极度不安。 结论和相关性:2022 年,大约五分之一的老年人报告存在与成本相关的药物不依从性。实时效益工具可能支持药物成本对话和有成本意识的处方,并且患者对其使用非常感兴趣。然而,如果披露的价格不准确,可能会因为对医生的信心丧失和不遵守规定的药物而产生潜在的危害。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009-4
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019-8-22
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025-9
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-7-1
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025-7
Pain Rep. 2025-6-25
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025-3-3
Am J Manag Care. 2022-10-1
Appl Clin Inform. 2022-10
JAMA Intern Med. 2022-11-1
Med Care Res Rev. 2023-2
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022-5-11