Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Gurgaon, India.
Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, APHP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, 100, bd General Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
J Hepatol. 2023 Jun;78(6):1124-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.032.
In this debate, the authors consider whether patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombosis are candidates for liver transplantation (LT). The argument for LT in this context is based on the premise that, following successful downstaging treatment, LT confers a much greater clinical benefit in terms of survival outcomes than the available alternative (palliative systemic therapy). A major argument against relates to limitations in the quality of evidence for LT in this setting - in relation to study design, as well as heterogeneity in patient characteristics and downstaging protocols. While acknowledging the superior outcomes offered by LT for patients with portal vein tumour thrombosis, the counterargument is that expected survival in such patients is still below accepted thresholds for LT and, indeed, the levels achieved for other patients who receive transplants beyond the Milan criteria. Based on the available evidence, it seems too early for consensus guidelines to recommend such an approach, however, it is hoped that with higher quality evidence and standardised downstaging protocols, LT may soon be more widely indicated, including for this population with high unmet clinical need.
在这场辩论中,作者们考虑了患有肝细胞癌(HCC)和门静脉癌栓的患者是否适合接受肝移植(LT)。在这种情况下,LT 的论据基于这样一个前提,即成功的降期治疗后,LT 在生存结果方面提供的临床获益要远远大于可用的替代方案(姑息性全身治疗)。反对的一个主要论点涉及到 LT 在这种情况下的证据质量存在局限性 - 涉及到研究设计,以及患者特征和降期方案的异质性。尽管承认 LT 为门静脉癌栓患者提供了更好的结果,但反驳的观点是,这些患者的预期生存仍然低于 LT 的可接受标准,实际上,对于接受米兰标准以外移植的其他患者来说,这一水平也是可以达到的。基于现有的证据,共识指南建议采用这种方法还为时过早,然而,人们希望随着高质量证据和标准化降期方案的出现,LT 可能很快会得到更广泛的应用,包括对这种具有高度未满足临床需求的人群。