Lanssens Armien, Tuts Nora, Welkenhuyzen Lies, Thielen Hella, Gillebert Celine R
Department of Brain and Cognition, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Centre for Translational Psychological Research, Hospital East-Limburg, Limburg, Belgium.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):782-798. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2213792. Epub 2023 May 21.
Many activities in daily life rely on the ability to continuously keep attention on task requirements. Patients with acquired brain injury often suffer from deficits in sustained attention that impact quality of life and complicate rehabilitation. The sustained attention to response task (SART) is a commonly used go/no-go task in the assessment of sustained attention. However, its feasibility for patients with acquired brain injury could be questioned considering deficits in alphanumerical processing following brain damage. We investigated whether a SART with sinusoidal gratings instead of digits can be used to assess sustained attention. The Gratings SART and Digits SART were administered in a random and fixed sequence to 48 cognitively healthy participants. Performance of the neurotypical individuals on the random and fixed Gratings SART was only moderately different from and correlated with performance on the random and fixed Digits SART. As a proof of concept, the SARTs were also administered to 11 cases with acquired brain injury. Performance in the random and fixed variants of both the Gratings SART and Digits SART was sensitive to cognitive impairments of cases with acquired brain injury. In conclusion, the SART with sinusoidal gratings holds promise as a tool to (re-)assess sustained attention in clinical practice. Further research is critical to investigate whether its performance accurately predicts sustained attention in daily life since we failed to find a significant correlation between performance on any of the SARTs and a self-reported measure of sustained attention.
日常生活中的许多活动都依赖于持续关注任务要求的能力。后天性脑损伤患者常常存在持续注意力缺陷,这会影响生活质量并使康复变得复杂。持续注意力对反应任务(SART)是评估持续注意力时常用的一种执行/不执行任务。然而,考虑到脑损伤后字母数字处理方面的缺陷,其对后天性脑损伤患者的可行性可能会受到质疑。我们研究了用正弦光栅代替数字的SART是否可用于评估持续注意力。将光栅SART和数字SART以随机和固定顺序施测于48名认知健康的参与者。神经典型个体在随机和固定光栅SART上的表现与在随机和固定数字SART上的表现仅有适度差异且呈相关。作为概念验证,SART也施测于11例后天性脑损伤患者。光栅SART和数字SART的随机和固定变体的表现对后天性脑损伤患者的认知损伤敏感。总之,正弦光栅SART有望成为临床实践中(重新)评估持续注意力的一种工具。由于我们未能在任何一种SART的表现与自我报告的持续注意力测量之间发现显著相关性,进一步研究对于探究其表现是否能准确预测日常生活中的持续注意力至关重要。