University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Jul 1;177(7):693-699. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.1291.
Optimal hemostatic resuscitation in pediatric trauma is not well defined.
To assess the association of prehospital blood transfusion (PHT) with outcomes in injured children.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study of the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation database included children aged 0 to 17 years old who received a PHT or emergency department blood transfusion (EDT) from January 2009 and December 2019. Interfacility transfers and isolated burn mechanism were excluded. Analysis took place between November 2022 and January 2023.
Receipt of a blood product transfusion in the prehospital setting compared with the emergency department.
The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. A 3:1 propensity score match was developed balancing for age, injury mechanism, shock index, and prehospital Glasgow Comma Scale score. A mixed-effects logistic regression was performed in the matched cohort further accounting for patient sex, Injury Severity Score, insurance status, and potential center-level heterogeneity. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and complications.
Of 559 children included, 70 (13%) received prehospital transfusions. In the unmatched cohort, the PHT and EDT groups had comparable age (median [IQR], 47 [9-16] vs 14 [9-17] years), sex (46 [66%] vs 337 [69%] were male), and insurance status (42 [60%] vs 245 [50%]). The PHT group had higher rates of shock (39 [55%] vs 204 [42%]) and blunt trauma mechanism (57 [81%] vs 277 [57%]) and lower median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (14 [5-29] vs 25 [16-36]). Propensity matching resulted in a weighted cohort of 207 children, including 68 of 70 recipients of PHT, and produced well-balanced groups. Both 24-hour (11 [16%] vs 38 [27%]) and in-hospital mortality (14 [21%] vs 44 [32%]) were lower in the PHT cohort compared with the EDT cohort, respectively; there was no difference in in-hospital complications. Mixed-effects logistic regression in the postmatched group adjusting for the confounders listed above found PHT was associated with a significant reduction in 24-hour (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91) and in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97) compared with EDT. The number needed to transfuse in the prehospital setting to save 1 child's life was 5 (95% CI, 3-10).
In this study, prehospital transfusion was associated with lower rates of mortality compared with transfusion on arrival to the emergency department, suggesting bleeding pediatric patients may benefit from early hemostatic resuscitation. Further prospective studies are warranted. Although the logistics of prehospital blood product programs are complex, strategies to shift hemostatic resuscitation toward the immediate postinjury period should be pursued.
儿科创伤的最佳止血复苏尚未得到明确界定。
评估院前输血(PHT)与受伤儿童结局的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究回顾了宾夕法尼亚创伤系统基金会数据库中的队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 PHT 或急诊科输血(EDT)的 0 至 17 岁儿童。排除了院间转运和孤立烧伤机制。分析于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 1 月之间进行。
与急诊科相比,在院前环境中接受血液制品输注。
主要结局为 24 小时死亡率。采用 3:1 倾向评分匹配,根据年龄、损伤机制、休克指数和院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分平衡。在匹配队列中进一步进行混合效应逻辑回归,进一步考虑患者性别、损伤严重程度评分、保险状况和潜在的中心水平异质性。次要结局包括院内死亡率和并发症。
在 559 名儿童中,70 名(13%)接受了院前输血。在未匹配的队列中,PHT 和 EDT 组的年龄(中位数[IQR],47[9-16] vs 14[9-17]岁)、性别(46[66%] vs 337[69%]为男性)和保险状况(42[60%] vs 245[50%])相似。PHT 组休克发生率(39[55%] vs 204[42%])和钝器损伤机制(57[81%] vs 277[57%])较高,损伤严重程度评分中位数(IQR)较低(14[5-29] vs 25[16-36])。倾向评分匹配产生了一个权重为 207 名儿童的加权队列,包括 70 名 PHT 接受者中的 68 名,产生了均衡的两组。与 EDT 组相比,PHT 组的 24 小时(11[16%] vs 38[27%])和院内死亡率(14[21%] vs 44[32%])均较低;院内并发症无差异。在调整了上述混杂因素的匹配后混合效应逻辑回归发现,与 EDT 相比,PHT 与 24 小时(调整后的优势比,0.46;95%CI,0.23-0.91)和院内死亡率(调整后的优势比,0.51;95%CI,0.27-0.97)降低显著相关。在院前环境中需要输血以挽救 1 名儿童生命的数量为 5(95%CI,3-10)。
本研究表明,与到达急诊科时输血相比,院前输血与死亡率降低相关,提示出血性儿科患者可能受益于早期止血复苏。需要进一步的前瞻性研究。尽管院前血液制品计划的后勤工作很复杂,但应寻求将止血复苏转移到受伤后即刻的策略。