Bell Christopher F, Wu Benjamin, Huang Shirley P, Rubin Bernard, Averell Carlyne M, Chastek Benjamin, Hulbert Erin M, Von Feldt Joan
US Value, Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Durham, USA.
US Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 19;15(4):e37839. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37839. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Lupus nephritis (LN) is among the most severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), affecting between 31% and 48% of patients, usually within five years of SLE diagnosis. SLE without LN is associated with a high economic burden on the healthcare system, and although data are limited, several studies have shown that SLE with LN could increase this burden. Aim: We aimed to compare the economic burden of LN versus SLE without LN among patients managed in routine clinical practices in the USA and describe the clinical course of these patients.
This was a retrospective observational study of patients with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance. It included 2310 patients with LN and 2310 matched patients who had SLE without LN; each patient was followed for 12 months after diagnosis (the patient's index date). Outcome measures included healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct healthcare costs, and SLE clinical manifestations. Results: In all healthcare settings, the mean (SD) use of all-cause healthcare resources was significantly higher in the LN versus SLE without LN cohort, including the mean number of ambulatory visits (53.9 (55.1) vs 33.0 (26.0)), emergency room visits (2.9 (7.9) vs 1.6 (3.3)), inpatient stays (0.9 (1.5) vs 0.3 (0.8)), and pharmacy fills (65.0 (48.3) vs 51.2 (42.6)) (all p<0.001). Total all-cause costs per patient in the LN cohort were also significantly higher compared with the SLE without LN cohort ($50,975 (86,281) vs $26,262 (52,720), p<0.001), including costs for inpatient stays and outpatient visits. Clinically, a significantly higher proportion of patients with LN experienced moderate or severe SLE flares compared with the SLE without LN cohort (p<0.001), which may explain the difference in HCRU and healthcare costs.
All-cause HCRU and costs were higher for patients with LN than for matched patients with SLE without LN, highlighting the economic burden associated with LN.
狼疮性肾炎(LN)是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)最严重的器官表现之一,通常在SLE诊断后的五年内影响31%至48%的患者。无LN的SLE给医疗保健系统带来了高昂的经济负担,尽管数据有限,但多项研究表明,伴有LN的SLE可能会增加这种负担。目的:我们旨在比较美国常规临床实践中LN患者与无LN的SLE患者的经济负担,并描述这些患者的临床病程。
这是一项对商业保险或医疗保险优势计划参保患者的回顾性观察研究。研究纳入了2310例LN患者和2310例匹配的无LN的SLE患者;每位患者在诊断后(患者的索引日期)随访12个月。观察指标包括医疗资源利用(HCRU)、直接医疗费用和SLE临床表现。结果:在所有医疗环境中,LN队列中全因医疗资源的平均(标准差)使用量显著高于无LN的SLE队列,包括门诊就诊次数(53.9(55.1)次对33.0(26.0)次)、急诊就诊次数(2.9(7.9)次对1.6(3.3)次)、住院天数(0.9(1.5)天对0.3(0.8)天)和药房配药次数(65.0(48.3)次对51.2(42.6)次)(所有p<0.001)。与无LN的SLE队列相比,LN队列中每位患者的全因总成本也显著更高(50,975美元(86,281美元)对26,262美元(52,720美元),p<0.001),包括住院费用和门诊费用。临床上,与无LN的SLE队列相比,LN患者中经历中度或重度SLE病情活动的比例显著更高(p<0.001),这可能解释了HCRU和医疗费用的差异。
LN患者的全因HCRU和费用高于匹配的无LN的SLE患者突显了与LN相关的经济负担。