Cirigliano Gabriele, Kriechling Philipp, Wieser Karl, Camenzind Roland Stefan
Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, BalgristUniversityHospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec;33(8):3547-3553. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03576-0. Epub 2023 May 24.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a well-establish procedure with increasing incidence. Depending on the medical history, many patients undergo multiple soft-tissue procedures before RTSA. The role of acromioclavicular pathology as well as the consequences of a distal clavicle resection (DCR) before RTSA has not been evaluated yet.
A retrospective single-center review was performed on all patients undergoing primary RTSA with or without DCR with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We compared patient-reported outcome measures (Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder values (SSV), and range of motion (ROM)) with a matched control group. The control group consisted of patients treated with a RTSA without DCR and matching was performed for age, sex, operating side, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), body mass index (BMI), and indication. Surgical time and complication rate were recorded.
Thirty-nine patients with a mean follow-up of 63 months (SD 33) were enrolled in the study group. Mean age was 67 years (SD 7) with 44% male patients for both groups. The mean relative CS improved from 43% (SD 17) to 73% (SD 20) in the study group, and from 43% (18) to 73% (22) in the control group. The SSV improved from 29% (SD 17) to 63% (SD 29) in the study group, and from 28% (SD 16) to 69% (SD 26) in the control group (both n.s.). The postoperative ROM did not significantly differ between the two groups. Five patients in the study group and six in the control group had reoperations.
Patients who received a DCR before RTSA showed equivalent clinical outcomes compared to a match-control group with RTSA only. Surgical time was not different, and no complication related to the open DCR was observed in the study group. Therefore, we conclude that a prior DCR does not influence the postoperative outcome after RTSA.
Level III: Retrospective comparative study.
反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)是一种已确立的手术,其发病率不断上升。根据病史,许多患者在进行RTSA之前接受过多次软组织手术。肩锁关节病变的作用以及RTSA之前远端锁骨切除术(DCR)的后果尚未得到评估。
对所有接受初次RTSA(无论有无DCR)且随访至少2年的患者进行回顾性单中心研究。我们将患者报告的结局指标(Constant评分(CS)、主观肩关节评分(SSV)和活动范围(ROM))与匹配的对照组进行比较。对照组由接受无DCR的RTSA治疗的患者组成,并根据年龄、性别、手术侧别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、体重指数(BMI)和手术指征进行匹配。记录手术时间和并发症发生率。
研究组纳入39例患者,平均随访63个月(标准差33)。两组患者的平均年龄均为67岁(标准差7)且男性患者均占44%。研究组的平均相对CS从43%(标准差17)提高到73%(标准差20),对照组从43%(18)提高到73%(22)。研究组SSV从29%(标准差17)提高到63%(标准差29),对照组从28%(标准差16)提高到69%(标准差26)(两者均无统计学意义)。两组术后ROM无显著差异。研究组有5例患者和对照组有6例患者进行了再次手术。
与仅接受RTSA的匹配对照组相比,在RTSA之前接受DCR的患者显示出相当的临床结局。手术时间无差异,研究组未观察到与开放性DCR相关的并发症。因此我们得出结论,术前DCR不影响RTSA术后结局
III级:回顾性比较研究。