d'Ailly Philip N, Mulders Marjolein A M, Coert J Henk, Schep Niels W L
Department of Hand and Trauma Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Wrist Surg. 2022 Aug 1;12(3):192-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750875. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular for diagnosing and treating traumatic wrist injuries. How wrist arthroscopy has influenced the daily practice of wrist surgeons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of wrist arthroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic wrist injuries among members of the International Wrist Arthroscopy Society (IWAS). An online survey was conducted among IWAS members between August and November 2021 with questions regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic importance of wrist arthroscopy. Questions focused on traumatic injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and scapholunate ligament (SLL). Multiple-choice questions were presented in the form of a Likert scale. The primary outcome was respondent agreement, defined as 80% answering similarly. The survey was completed by 211 respondents (39% response rate). The majority (81%) were certified or fellowship-trained wrist surgeons. Most respondents (74%) had performed over 100 wrist arthroscopies. Agreement was reached on 4 of the 22 questions. It was agreed that the outcomes of wrist arthroscopy strongly depend on surgeons' experience, that there is sufficient evidence for the diagnostic purposes of wrist arthroscopy, and that wrist arthroscopy is better than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing TFCC and SLL injuries. No agreement was reached on the preferred treatment of any type of TFCC or SLL injury. There is agreement that wrist arthroscopy is superior to MRI for diagnosing traumatic TFCC and SLL injuries, yet experts remain divided on the optimal management. Guidelines need to be developed for the standardization of indications and procedures. This is a Level III study.
腕关节镜检查在诊断和治疗腕部创伤性损伤方面越来越受欢迎。腕关节镜检查如何影响腕部外科医生的日常实践仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估腕关节镜检查在国际腕关节镜学会(IWAS)成员中对腕部创伤性损伤的诊断和治疗作用。
2021年8月至11月期间,对IWAS成员进行了一项在线调查,问题涉及腕关节镜检查的诊断和治疗重要性。问题集中在三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)和舟月韧带(SLL)的创伤性损伤。多项选择题以李克特量表的形式呈现。主要结果是受访者的一致性,定义为80%的人回答相似。
211名受访者完成了调查(回复率为39%)。大多数(81%)是经过认证或接受过专科培训的腕部外科医生。大多数受访者(74%)进行过100多次腕关节镜检查。22个问题中有4个达成了一致意见。大家一致认为,腕关节镜检查的结果很大程度上取决于外科医生的经验,腕关节镜检查用于诊断目的有充分的证据,并且在诊断TFCC和SLL损伤方面,腕关节镜检查优于磁共振成像(MRI)。对于任何类型的TFCC或SLL损伤的首选治疗方法未达成一致意见。
大家一致认为,在诊断创伤性TFCC和SLL损伤方面,腕关节镜检查优于MRI,但专家们在最佳治疗方法上仍存在分歧。需要制定指南以规范适应症和操作程序。
这是一项三级研究。