Suppr超能文献

帕克兰分级量表在确定腹腔镜胆囊切除术术中挑战方面的效用:尼泊尔一家学术医疗中心对206例患者的验证研究

Utility of the Parkland Grading Scale to determine intraoperative challenges during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a validation study on 206 patients at an academic medical center in Nepal.

作者信息

Shrestha Anup, Bhattarai Abhishek, Tamrakar Kishor Kumar, Chand Manoj, Yonjan Tamang Samjhana, Adhikari Sampada, Neupane Harish Chandra

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Chitwan Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Chitwan, Nepal.

Department of Surgery, Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Male, Maldives.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2023 May 24;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00364-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most of the scoring systems to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy are based on pre-operative clinical and radiological findings. Recently the Parkland Grading Scale system was introduced as a simple intra-operative grading scale. This study aims to utilize the Parkland Grading Scale system to assess the intraoperative challenges during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHOD

This was a prospective, cross-sectional study done at Chitwan Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Chitwan, Nepal. All the patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from April 2020 to March 2021. Based on the initial intra-operative finding, Parkland Grading Scale was noted and at the end of the surgery, the level of difficulty was given by the operating surgeon. All the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative findings were compared with the scale.

RESULTS

Out of 206 patients, there were 176 (85.4%) females, and 30 (14.6%) males. The median age was 41 years (Range 19-75). The median body mass index was 23.67 kg/m2. There were 35(17%) patients with a history of previous surgery. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 5.8%. According to Parkland Grading Scale, 67(32.5%), 75(36.4%), 42(20.4%), 15(7.3%), and 7(3.4%) were graded as grade 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. There was a difference in the Parkland grading scale in patients with a history of acute cholecystitis, gallbladder wall thickness, pericholecystic collection, stone size, and body mass index (p < 0.05). The total operative time, level of difficulty in surgery, rate of help needed from colleagues or replacement as the main surgeon, bile spillage, drain placement, gallbladder decompression, and conversion rate all increased with an increase in scale (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in the development of post-operative fever, and post-operative hospital stay as the scale increased (p < 0.05). The Tukey-Kramer test for all pair-wise comparisons revealed that each grade was significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) on the difficulty of surgery except for grade 4 from 5.

CONCLUSION

Parkland Grading Scale system is a reliable intra-operative grading system to assess the difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and helps the surgeon to change the strategy of surgery. An increase in scale is associated with an increased difficulty level of the surgery.

摘要

背景

大多数预测困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术的评分系统是基于术前临床和影像学检查结果。最近,帕克兰分级量表系统作为一种简单的术中分级量表被引入。本研究旨在利用帕克兰分级量表系统评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的术中挑战。

方法

这是一项在尼泊尔奇旺奇旺医学院教学医院进行的前瞻性横断面研究。所有患者在2020年4月至2021年3月期间接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。根据最初的术中发现记录帕克兰分级量表,手术结束时,由主刀医生给出困难程度。将所有术前、术中和术后的发现与该量表进行比较。

结果

206例患者中,女性176例(85.4%),男性30例(14.6%)。中位年龄为41岁(范围19 - 75岁)。中位体重指数为23.67kg/m²。有35例(17%)患者有既往手术史。转为开放手术的比例为5.8%。根据帕克兰分级量表,分别有67例(32.5%)、75例(36.4%)、42例(20.4%)、15例(7.3%)和7例(3.4%)被评为1级、2级、3级、4级和5级。有急性胆囊炎病史、胆囊壁厚度、胆囊周围积液、结石大小和体重指数的患者在帕克兰分级量表上存在差异(p < 0.05)。随着量表等级的增加,总手术时间、手术难度、需要同事帮助或更换主刀医生的比例、胆汁溢出、引流管放置、胆囊减压和转化率均增加(p < 0.05)。随着量表等级的增加,术后发热的发生率和术后住院时间显著增加(p < 0.05)。除4级和5级外,所有两两比较的Tukey-Kramer检验显示,各等级在手术难度上彼此有显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

帕克兰分级量表系统是一种可靠的术中分级系统,可用于评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术的难度,并帮助外科医生改变手术策略。量表等级的增加与手术难度水平的增加相关。

相似文献

2
A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Cholecystectomies Based on the Parkland Grading Scale.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68523. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis.
Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
A comparison of cholecystitis grading scales.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Mar;86(3):471-478. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002125.
6
Multicenter validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scale for acute cholecystitis.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jan 1;90(1):87-96. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002901.
8
Utilization of an Intraoperative Grading Scale in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Nepalese Perspective.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Nov 24;2020:8954572. doi: 10.1155/2020/8954572. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scoring System to Predict Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Five-Year Cross-Sectional Study.
Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Sep 6;2022:3530568. doi: 10.1155/2022/3530568. eCollection 2022.
2
Utilization of an Intraoperative Grading Scale in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Nepalese Perspective.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Nov 24;2020:8954572. doi: 10.1155/2020/8954572. eCollection 2020.
3
The Treatment of Gallstone Disease.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Feb 28;117(9):148-158. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0148.
5
Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):62-84. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.62.
6
Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis.
Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):110-121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6281-2. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis.
Am J Surg. 2018 Apr;215(4):625-630. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验