Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10485-10513. doi: 10.1177/08862605231172477. Epub 2023 May 25.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health problem worldwide. IPV-related perceptions and attitudes are linked to IPV's actual perpetration and related victimization. There is a typical gender paradigm in IPV, wherein women are victims and men are perpetrators, which influences judgments toward IPV. Some socio-cultural norms or unjust notions of gender are also intertwined with this paradigm and influence perceptions of IPV. This study explored judgments and attributions of IPV in the Chinese context while extensively considering directionality, gender stereotypes, and ambivalent sexism by surveying 887 participants online. Participants read 1 of 12 scenarios and made judgments and attributions of responsibility regarding IPV. The results indicate that hostile sexism is negatively correlated with IPV perception but positively correlated with its justification. The direction of perpetration and gender stereotypicality had some main effects on judgments of IPV, and there were some interactions between these factors. The perception level of IPV involving a traditional male partner was higher when the man was the perpetrator or when his female partner was traditional. In the unidirectional IPV scenarios, the perpetrators were judged as significantly more responsible than the victims, while in the bidirectional IPV scenarios, men were judged as significantly more responsible than women. Moreover, the relationship between gender stereotypicality and responsibility attributions to female partners was significantly moderated by benevolent sexism (BS). Participants with a high level of BS tended to attribute less responsibility to traditional women than non-traditional women in bidirectional IPV scenarios. Future studies on IPV should pay attention to the influence of directionality and gender stereotypes. More efforts ought to be made to reduce IPV and overcome gender role stereotypes and sexism.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是全球范围内一个严重的公共卫生问题。与 IPV 相关的认知和态度与 IPV 的实际实施和相关受害有关。在 IPV 中存在典型的性别范式,即女性是受害者,男性是施害者,这影响了对 IPV 的判断。一些社会文化规范或不公平的性别观念也与这种范式交织在一起,影响了对 IPV 的认知。本研究通过在线调查 887 名参与者,广泛考虑了方向性、性别刻板印象和矛盾性别歧视,探讨了中国语境下对 IPV 的判断和归因。参与者阅读了 12 个情景中的 1 个,并对 IPV 的责任做出了判断和归因。结果表明,敌意性别歧视与 IPV 感知呈负相关,但与合理化呈正相关。实施的方向和性别刻板印象对 IPV 的判断有一些主要影响,这些因素之间存在一些相互作用。当男性是施害者或其女性伴侣传统时,涉及传统男性伴侣的 IPV 感知水平较高。在单向 IPV 情景中,施害者被认为比受害者更负责任,而在双向 IPV 情景中,男性被认为比女性更负责任。此外,性别刻板印象与对女性伴侣责任归因之间的关系被仁慈性别歧视(BS)显著调节。具有高水平 BS 的参与者在双向 IPV 情景中比非传统女性更倾向于将较少的责任归因于传统女性。未来的 IPV 研究应注意方向性和性别刻板印象的影响。应做出更多努力来减少 IPV,克服性别角色刻板印象和性别歧视。