Suppr超能文献

与多导睡眠图相比,便携式监测仪用于脊髓灰质炎幸存者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查的验证

Validation of a portable monitor compared with polysomnography for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in polio survivors.

作者信息

Ding Qidi, Liu Jianghua, Wu Jinxian, Du Juan, Li Xiao, Wang Meng, Sun Yunliang, Yu Yan, Wang Jingyu, Sun Ting, Zhang Chi, Lv Changjun, Strohl Kingman P, Han Fang, Dong Xiaosong

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 May 9;14:1137535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1137535. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

SUBJECTIVE

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in polio survivors. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent type. Full polysomnography (PSG) is recommended for OSA diagnosis in patients with comorbidities by current practice guidelines, but it is not always accessible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether type 3 portable monitor (PM) or type 4 PM might be a viable alternative to PSG for the diagnosis of OSA in postpolio subjects.

METHODS

A total of 48 community-living polio survivors (39 men and 9 women) with an average age of 54.4 ± 5.3 years referred for the evaluation of OSA and who volunteered to participate were recruited. First, they completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire and underwent pulmonary function testing and blood gas tests the day before PSG night. Then, they underwent an overnight in-laboratory PSG with a type 3 PM and type 4 PM recording simultaneously.

RESULTS

The AHI from PSG, respiratory event index (REI) from type 3 PM, and ODI from type 4 PM was 30.27 ± 22.51/h vs. 25.18 ± 19.11/h vs. 18.28 ± 15.13/h, respectively ( < 0.001). For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 95.45 and 50%, respectively. For AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity and specificity of REI were 87.88% and 93.33%, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis of REI on PM vs. AHI on PSG showed a mean difference of -5.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.10, -3.08; < 0.001) with limits of agreement ranging from -18.67 to 8.49 events/h. ROC curve analysis for patients with REI ≥ 15/h showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. For AHI ≥ 5/h, the sensitivity and specificity of ODI from type 4 PM were 86.36 and 75%, respectively. For patients with AHI ≥ 15/h, the sensitivity was 66.67%, and the specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Type 3 PM and Type 4 PM could be alternative ways to screen OSA for polio survivors, especially for moderate to severe OSA.

摘要

主观因素

睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)在脊髓灰质炎幸存者中极为普遍。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是最常见的类型。根据当前的实践指南,对于患有合并症的患者,建议进行全夜多导睡眠图(PSG)检查以诊断OSA,但并非总能进行该项检查。本研究的目的是评估3型便携式监测仪(PM)或4型PM是否可作为PSG的可行替代方法,用于诊断脊髓灰质炎后遗症患者的OSA。

方法

共招募了48名社区居住的脊髓灰质炎幸存者(39名男性和9名女性),平均年龄为54.4±5.3岁,他们因OSA评估前来就诊且自愿参与。首先,他们在PSG检查前一天完成了爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)问卷,并进行了肺功能测试和血气测试。然后,他们在实验室进行了一夜的PSG检查,同时记录3型PM和4型PM的数据。

结果

PSG的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、3型PM的呼吸事件指数(REI)和4型PM的氧减指数(ODI)分别为30.27±22.51次/小时、25.18±19.11次/小时和18.28±15.13次/小时(<0.001)。对于AHI≥5次/小时,REI的敏感性和特异性分别为95.45%和50%。对于AHI≥15次/小时,REI的敏感性和特异性分别为87.88%和93.33%。PM上的REI与PSG上的AHI的Bland-Altman分析显示平均差异为-5.09(95%置信区间[CI]:-7.10,-3.08;<0.001),一致性界限为-18.67至8.49次/小时。对REI≥15次/小时的患者进行ROC曲线分析,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.97。对于AHI≥5次/小时,4型PM的ODI的敏感性和特异性分别为86.36%和75%。对于AHI≥15次/小时的患者,敏感性为66.67%,特异性为100%。

结论

3型PM和4型PM可作为筛查脊髓灰质炎幸存者OSA的替代方法,尤其是对于中重度OSA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508c/10203206/1d8ff69eacf5/fneur-14-1137535-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验