• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌伴偶然发现高危因素的生存结局。

Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.012
PMID:37229880
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previously, we suggested that patients with cervical cancer (CC) with tumors ≤2 cm on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are safe candidates for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH). Here, we aim to investigate whether LRH deteriorates the prognosis of patients with incidentally identified high-risk factors; lymph node metastasis (LNM) or parametrial invasion (PMI).

METHODS

We identified patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB1 CC who underwent Type C LRH or open radical hysterectomy (ORH) at three tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2019. Those with a tumor ≤2 cm on preoperative MRI who were not suspicious of LNM or PMI preoperatively were included, while those who were indicated to receive adjuvant treatment but did not actually receive it were excluded. Survival outcomes were compared between the LRH and ORH groups in the overall population, then narrowed down to those with LNM, and then to those with PMI.

RESULTS

In total, 498 patients were included: 299 in the LRH group and 199 in the ORH group. The LRH and ORH groups showed similar 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (94.0% vs. 93.6%; P = 0.615) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (97.2% vs. 96.8%; P = 0.439). On pathologic examination, 49 (9.8%) and 16 (3.2%) patients had LNM and PMI, respectively, and 10 (2.0%) had both. In the LNM subgroup, 5-year PFS rate was not significantly different between the LRH and ORH groups (73.2% vs. 91.7%; P = 0.169). In the PMI subgroup, no difference in PFS was observed between the two groups (P = 0.893).

CONCLUSIONS

LRH might not deteriorate recurrence and mortality rates in CC patients with tumors ≤2 cm when adjuvant treatment is appropriately administered, even if pathologic LNM and PMI are incidentally identified.

摘要

目的

此前,我们提出对于术前磁共振成像(MRI)显示肿瘤直径≤2cm 的宫颈癌(CC)患者,腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(LRH)是安全的选择。在此,我们旨在研究 LRH 是否会使术前偶然发现的高危因素(淋巴结转移[LNM]或宫旁浸润[PMI])患者的预后恶化。

方法

我们在 2000 年至 2019 年期间,在三家三级医院中,识别了接受 C 型 LRH 或开放性根治性子宫切除术(ORH)的 2009 年 FIGO 分期 IB1 CC 患者。纳入了术前 MRI 显示肿瘤直径≤2cm 且术前无 LNM 或 PMI 可疑的患者,而排除了那些需要接受辅助治疗但实际上未接受的患者。比较了 LRH 和 ORH 组在总体人群中的生存结果,然后缩小到 LNM 组,然后缩小到 PMI 组。

结果

共纳入 498 例患者:LRH 组 299 例,ORH 组 199 例。LRH 和 ORH 组的 3 年无进展生存率(PFS)(94.0% vs. 93.6%;P=0.615)和 5 年总生存率(OS)率(97.2% vs. 96.8%;P=0.439)相似。在病理检查中,分别有 49(9.8%)和 16(3.2%)例患者有 LNM 和 PMI,10(2.0%)例患者同时存在 LNM 和 PMI。在 LNM 亚组中,LRH 和 ORH 组的 5 年 PFS 率无显著差异(73.2% vs. 91.7%;P=0.169)。在 PMI 亚组中,两组间 PFS 无差异(P=0.893)。

结论

在适当应用辅助治疗的情况下,LRH 可能不会使肿瘤直径≤2cm 的 CC 患者的复发和死亡率恶化,即使偶然发现病理 LNM 和 PMI。

相似文献

1
Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌伴偶然发现高危因素的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术对 FIGO 分期 IB 期宫颈癌患者生存结局的影响:韩国两家医院的匹配研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
4
Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.接受开放式、机器人辅助或腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的宫颈癌患者生存率比较:五年经验。
Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;25(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.经阴道子宫切除术的剖腹根治性子宫切除术与微创根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB1 期至 IIA2 期宫颈癌:生存结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 25;101(8):e28911. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028911.
6
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌:匹配队列研究的长期生存结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):903-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
7
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的荟萃分析,不包括机器人辅助与开放式根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27430-9.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.比较肿瘤大小≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):564-571. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000994. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
[Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].腹腔镜与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗Ⅰa2 - Ⅱb期宫颈癌患者的安全性和有效性比较
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):915-22.
10
Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.IA2 - IB1期宫颈癌全腹腔镜与开放性根治性子宫切除术:疾病复发与生存比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jun;24(6):373-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0514. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.早期子宫颈癌的微创治疗方法:LACC试验的影响及文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040620.
2
Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.宫颈癌的进展:当前见解与未来方向
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2025 Feb;45(2):77-109. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12629. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Controversies and Advances in the Personalized Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
宫颈癌个体化手术治疗的争议与进展
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 6;14(6):606. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060606.