Vasenina Ecaterina, Stout Jeffrey R, Fukuda David H
Physiology of Work and Exercise Response (POWER) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2023 May 17;11(5):106. doi: 10.3390/sports11050106.
(1) Background: There is a lack of literature that examines the impact of early vs. late sport specialization on quality of life after retirement from tennis. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between early specialization in the sport of tennis and health outcomes after retirement from collegiate/professional sport; (2) Methods: Participants were recruited through social media posts, newsletters, and contacts with tennis organizations. Basic demographic and injury information was collected from 157 former tennis players, along with the age of tennis specialization and two questionnaires: the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Questionnaire on Health Problems (OSTRC), and the CDC HRQOL-14 "Healthy Days Measure" Questionnaire (HRQOL); (3) Results: Significant differences (F = 5.160, < 0.025) in the specialization age between the low (11.9 ± 4.5 y) and high (9.8 ± 4.1 y) OSTRC groups were found after covarying for the current age. No difference (F = 0.676, < 0.414) was shown among the high (10.9 ± 4.4 y) and low (11.28 ± 4.6 y) HRQOL groups for the specialization age after covarying for the current age. A weak negative correlation was identified between the OSTRC score and specialization age (r = -0.233, = 0.008), while no significant changes were shown between the specialization age and HRQOL score (r = -0.021, = 0.857), or between the OSTRC and HRQOL scores (r = 0.146, = 0.208); (4) Conclusions: Retired tennis players with low injury/illness severity scores specialized in tennis later than those with high injury/illness severity scores, while no differences in the specialization age were noted when the sample was separated into HRQOL groups.
(1)背景:缺乏关于早期与晚期运动专项化对网球退役后生活质量影响的文献。因此,本研究的目的是探讨网球运动早期专项化与大学/职业运动退役后的健康结果之间的关系;(2)方法:通过社交媒体帖子、时事通讯以及与网球组织的联系招募参与者。收集了157名前网球运动员的基本人口统计学和伤病信息,以及网球专项化年龄和两份问卷:奥斯陆运动创伤研究中心健康问题问卷(OSTRC)和美国疾病控制与预防中心健康相关生活质量-14“健康天数测量”问卷(HRQOL);(3)结果:在对当前年龄进行协变量调整后,低OSTRC组(11.9±4.5岁)和高OSTRC组(9.8±4.1岁)的专项化年龄存在显著差异(F = 5.160,P < 0.025)。在对当前年龄进行协变量调整后,高HRQOL组(10.9±4.4岁)和低HRQOL组(11.28±4.6岁)的专项化年龄未显示出差异(F = 0.676,P < 0.414)。OSTRC评分与专项化年龄之间存在弱负相关(r = -0.233,P = 0.008),而专项化年龄与HRQOL评分之间未显示出显著变化(r = -0.021,P = 0.857),OSTRC与HRQOL评分之间也未显示出显著变化(r = 0.146,P = 0.208);(4)结论:伤病严重程度评分低的退役网球运动员比伤病严重程度评分高的运动员更晚开始专项化从事网球运动,而当样本按HRQOL组分开时,专项化年龄没有差异。