1Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
2Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami, Florida.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 May 26;39(3):427-437. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23336. Print 2023 Sep 1.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the gold standard for assessing postoperative outcomes in spine surgery. However, PROMs are also limited by the inherent subjectivity of self-reported qualitative data. Recent literature has highlighted the utility of patient mobility data streamed from smartphone accelerometers as an objective measure of functional outcomes and complement to traditional PROMs. Still, for activity-based data to supplement existing PROMs, they must be validated against current metrics. In this study, the authors assessed the relationships and concordance between longitudinal smartphone-based mobility data and PROMs.
Patients receiving laminectomy (n = 21) or fusion (n = 10) between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Activity data (steps-per-day count) recorded in the Apple Health mobile application over a 2-year perioperative window were extracted and subsequently normalized to allow for intersubject comparison. PROMS, including the visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D, collected at the preoperative and 6-week postoperative visits were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record. Correlations between PROMs and patient mobility were assessed and compared between patients who did and those who did not achieve the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each measure.
A total of 31 patients receiving laminectomy (n = 21) or fusion (n = 10) were included. Change between preoperative and 6-week postoperative VAS and PROMIS-PI scores demonstrated moderate (r = -0.46) and strong (r = -0.74) inverse correlations, respectively, with changes in normalized steps-per-day count. In cohorts of patients who achieved PROMIS-PI MCID postoperatively, indicating subjective improvement in pain, there was a 0.784 standard deviation increase in normalized steps per day, representing a 56.5% improvement (p = 0.027). Patients who did achieve the MCID of improvement in either PROMIS-PI or VAS after surgery were more likely to experience an earlier sustained improvement in physical activity commensurate to or greater than their preoperative baseline (p = 2.98 × 10-18) than non-MCID patients.
This study demonstrates a strong correlation between changes in mobility data extracted from patient smartphones and changes in PROMs following spine surgery. Further elucidating this relationship will allow for more robust supplementation of existing spine outcome measure tools with analyzed objective activity data.
患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)是评估脊柱手术术后结果的金标准。然而,PROMs 也受到自我报告的定性数据固有的主观性的限制。最近的文献强调了从智能手机加速度计流式传输的患者活动数据作为功能结果的客观测量和对传统 PROMs 的补充的效用。尽管如此,为了使基于活动的数据补充现有的 PROMs,它们必须与当前的指标进行验证。在这项研究中,作者评估了纵向基于智能手机的活动数据与 PROMs 之间的关系和一致性。
回顾性纳入 2017 年至 2022 年间接受椎板切除术(n=21)或融合术(n=10)的患者。从苹果健康移动应用程序中提取并随后归一化(以允许受试者间比较)记录的 2 年围手术期窗口内的活动数据(每日步数计数)。从电子病历中回顾性提取术前和术后 6 周的 PROMs,包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、患者报告的结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(PROMIS-PI)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和 EQ-5D。评估 PROMs 与患者活动之间的相关性,并比较在未达到每个指标的既定最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者与达到 MCID 的患者之间的相关性。
共纳入 31 名接受椎板切除术(n=21)或融合术(n=10)的患者。术前和术后 6 周 VAS 和 PROMIS-PI 评分之间的变化与归一化每日步数计数之间呈中度(r=-0.46)和强(r=-0.74)负相关。在术后达到 PROMIS-PI MCID 的患者队列中,疼痛主观改善表明,归一化后的每日步数增加了 0.784 个标准差,代表 56.5%的改善(p=0.027)。术后达到 PROMIS-PI 或 VAS 改善 MCID 的患者更有可能经历与术前基线相当或更大的身体活动的早期持续改善(p=2.98×10-18),而非 MCID 患者。
本研究表明,从患者智能手机中提取的活动数据的变化与脊柱手术后 PROMs 的变化之间存在很强的相关性。进一步阐明这种关系将允许使用分析的客观活动数据更有效地补充现有的脊柱结果测量工具。