文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

机器人辅助立体脑电图中的植入精度和手术变量。

Implantation accuracy and operative variables in robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography.

机构信息

1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

4Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2023 May 26;139(6):1598-1603. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.JNS222515. Print 2023 Dec 1.


DOI:10.3171/2023.4.JNS222515
PMID:37243553
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) procedure provides a unique 3D overview of the seizure-onset zone. Although the success of SEEG relies on the accuracy of depth electrode implantation, few studies have investigated how different implantation techniques and operative variables affect accuracy. This study examined the effect of two different electrode implantation techniques (external vs internal stylet) on implantation accuracy while controlling for other operative variables. METHODS: The implantation accuracy of 508 depth electrodes from 39 SEEG cases was measured after coregistration of postimplantation CT or MR images with planned trajectories. Two different implantation techniques were compared: preset length with internal stylet use and measured length with external stylet use. Correlations between implantation accuracy and technique type, entry angle, intended implantation depth, and other operative variables were determined statistically using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed that the internal stylet technique exhibited a larger target radial error (p = 0.046) and angular deviation (p = 0.039) with a smaller depth error (p < 0.001) than the external stylet technique. Entry angle and implantation depth were positively correlated with target radial error (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively) only for the internal stylet technique. CONCLUSIONS: Better target radial accuracy was achieved when an external stylet was used to open the intraparenchymal pathway for the depth electrode. In addition, more oblique trajectories were equally accurate to orthogonal ones with the usage of an external stylet, while more oblique trajectories were associated with larger target radial errors with the usage of an internal stylet (without an external stylet).

摘要

目的:立体脑电图(SEEG)程序提供了发作起始区的独特 3D 概述。尽管 SEEG 的成功依赖于深度电极植入的准确性,但很少有研究探讨不同的植入技术和手术变量如何影响准确性。本研究在控制其他手术变量的同时,研究了两种不同的电极植入技术(外部与内部套管)对植入准确性的影响。

方法:将术后 CT 或 MR 图像与计划轨迹进行配准后,测量了 39 例 SEES 病例中 508 个深部电极的植入准确性。比较了两种不同的植入技术:使用内置套管的预设长度和使用外置套管的测量长度。使用多元回归分析统计确定植入准确性与技术类型、进入角度、预期植入深度和其他手术变量之间的相关性。

结果:多元回归分析显示,与外部套管技术相比,内部套管技术的目标径向误差(p=0.046)和角度偏差(p=0.039)更大,而深度误差更小(p<0.001)。仅对于内部套管技术,进入角度和植入深度与目标径向误差呈正相关(p=0.007 和<0.001)。

结论:使用外部套管打开深部电极的脑内通路时,目标径向精度更高。此外,与外部套管技术相比,使用外部套管时,更倾斜的轨迹与正交轨迹同样准确,而使用内部套管(无外部套管)时,更倾斜的轨迹与更大的目标径向误差相关。

相似文献

[1]
Implantation accuracy and operative variables in robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography.

J Neurosurg. 2023-12-1

[2]
How can the accuracy of SEEG be increased?-an analysis of the accuracy of multilobe-spanning SEEG electrodes based on a frameless stereotactic robot-assisted system.

Ann Palliat Med. 2021-4

[3]
Accuracy of robot-assisted versus optical frameless navigated stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement in children.

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019-3-1

[4]
The Association Between Trajectory-Skull Angle and Accuracy of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

World Neurosurg. 2024-4

[5]
Robot-assisted versus manual navigated stereoelectroencephalography in adult medically-refractory epilepsy patients.

Epilepsy Res. 2020-1

[6]
Techniques for placement of stereotactic electroencephalographic depth electrodes: Comparison of implantation and tracking accuracies in a cadaveric human study.

Epilepsia. 2018-8-24

[7]
Frame-based versus robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-2-16

[8]
Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017-9

[9]
Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography exploration of the limbic thalamus in human focal epilepsy: implantation technique and complications in the first 24 patients.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-4-1

[10]
A comparison between robot-guided and stereotactic frame-based stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

J Robot Surg. 2023-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Stereoelectroencephalography for drug resistant epilepsy: precision and complications in stepwise improvement of frameless implantation.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025-3-17

[2]
Advancements in Surgical Therapies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Paradigm Shift towards Precision Care.

Neurol Ther. 2025-4

[3]
SEEG in 2025: progress and pending challenges in stereotaxy methods, biomarkers and radiofrequency thermocoagulation.

Curr Opin Neurol. 2025-4-1

[4]
Early case series with placement of NeuroOne Evo stereoelectroencephalography depth electrodes and review of other Food and Drug Administration-approved products.

Surg Neurol Int. 2024-12-6

[5]
Implantation accuracy of novel polyimide stereotactic electroencephalographic depth electrodes-a human cadaveric study.

Front Med Technol. 2024-2-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索