1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Neurosurg. 2023 May 26;139(6):1598-1603. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.JNS222515. Print 2023 Dec 1.
OBJECTIVE: The stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) procedure provides a unique 3D overview of the seizure-onset zone. Although the success of SEEG relies on the accuracy of depth electrode implantation, few studies have investigated how different implantation techniques and operative variables affect accuracy. This study examined the effect of two different electrode implantation techniques (external vs internal stylet) on implantation accuracy while controlling for other operative variables. METHODS: The implantation accuracy of 508 depth electrodes from 39 SEEG cases was measured after coregistration of postimplantation CT or MR images with planned trajectories. Two different implantation techniques were compared: preset length with internal stylet use and measured length with external stylet use. Correlations between implantation accuracy and technique type, entry angle, intended implantation depth, and other operative variables were determined statistically using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed that the internal stylet technique exhibited a larger target radial error (p = 0.046) and angular deviation (p = 0.039) with a smaller depth error (p < 0.001) than the external stylet technique. Entry angle and implantation depth were positively correlated with target radial error (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively) only for the internal stylet technique. CONCLUSIONS: Better target radial accuracy was achieved when an external stylet was used to open the intraparenchymal pathway for the depth electrode. In addition, more oblique trajectories were equally accurate to orthogonal ones with the usage of an external stylet, while more oblique trajectories were associated with larger target radial errors with the usage of an internal stylet (without an external stylet).
目的:立体脑电图(SEEG)程序提供了发作起始区的独特 3D 概述。尽管 SEEG 的成功依赖于深度电极植入的准确性,但很少有研究探讨不同的植入技术和手术变量如何影响准确性。本研究在控制其他手术变量的同时,研究了两种不同的电极植入技术(外部与内部套管)对植入准确性的影响。
方法:将术后 CT 或 MR 图像与计划轨迹进行配准后,测量了 39 例 SEES 病例中 508 个深部电极的植入准确性。比较了两种不同的植入技术:使用内置套管的预设长度和使用外置套管的测量长度。使用多元回归分析统计确定植入准确性与技术类型、进入角度、预期植入深度和其他手术变量之间的相关性。
结果:多元回归分析显示,与外部套管技术相比,内部套管技术的目标径向误差(p=0.046)和角度偏差(p=0.039)更大,而深度误差更小(p<0.001)。仅对于内部套管技术,进入角度和植入深度与目标径向误差呈正相关(p=0.007 和<0.001)。
结论:使用外部套管打开深部电极的脑内通路时,目标径向精度更高。此外,与外部套管技术相比,使用外部套管时,更倾斜的轨迹与正交轨迹同样准确,而使用内部套管(无外部套管)时,更倾斜的轨迹与更大的目标径向误差相关。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-2-16
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017-9