Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, 266100, PR China.
Key Lab of Soil Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture/College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Chemosphere. 2023 Sep;334:139044. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139044. Epub 2023 May 25.
In agricultural production, biodegradable plastic mulching film (Bio-PMF) has the potential to replace conventional plastic mulching film (CPMF) due to its degradability, but their impacts on soil-crop ecology are controversial. In this study, from 2019 to 2021, effects of CPMF and Bio-PMF on the soil-crop ecology and soil pollution were evaluated on a peanut farm. Compared to the Bio-PMF, an overall improvement in the soil-peanut ecology under the CPMF was observed, including an increase of 10.77 ± 4.8% in peanut yield, an amelioration of four soil physicochemical properties (total P and available P in the flowering stage, total P and temperature in the mature stage), an increase of rhizobacterial relative abundances in class level (Bacteroidia, Blastocatellia, Thermoleophilia and Vicinamibacteria in the flowering stage, Nitrospira and Bacilli in the mature stage) and genus level (RB41 and Bacillus in the flowering stage, Bacillus and Dongia in the mature stage), and an enhancement of soil nitrogen metabolism abilities (ureolysis, nitrification and aerobic ammonia in the flowering stage, nitrate reduction and nitrite ammonification in the mature stage). These preserved soil nutrients and temperature, reshaped rhizobacterial communities, and enhanced soil nitrogen metabolism abilities in the mature stage were obviously correlated with peanut yield under CPMF. However, such remarkable relations were not existed under Bio-PMF. In addition, compared with Bio-PMF, CPMF significantly increased the contents of dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and microplastics (MPs) in soil by 79.93, 44.55, 138.72 and 14.1%, respectively. Thus, CPMF improved soil-peanut ecology and caused serious soil pollution, while Bio-PMF introduced little pollutants into the soil and had little impact on soil-peanut ecology. Based on these, the degradation ability of CPMF or the ecological improvement capacity of Bio-PMF should be improved to obtain the environmentally and soil-crop ecology friendly plastic film in the future.
在农业生产中,由于可生物降解塑料地膜(Bio-PMF)具有可降解性,因此有可能替代传统塑料地膜(CPMF),但其对土壤-作物生态的影响存在争议。本研究于 2019 年至 2021 年在花生田中评估了 CPMF 和 Bio-PMF 对土壤-作物生态和土壤污染的影响。与 Bio-PMF 相比,CPMF 下的土壤-花生生态得到了整体改善,包括花生产量增加 10.77±4.8%,四个土壤理化性质(开花期总磷和有效磷、成熟期总磷和温度)得到改善,类水平(开花期的拟杆菌门、巴氏杆菌门、嗜热菌门和 Vicinamibacteria,成熟阶段的硝化螺旋菌门和芽孢杆菌门)和属水平(开花期的 RB41 和芽孢杆菌门,成熟阶段的芽孢杆菌门和 Dongia)的根际细菌相对丰度增加,以及土壤氮素代谢能力增强(开花期的脲酶解、硝化和有氧氨化,成熟阶段的硝酸盐还原和亚硝酸盐氨化)。这些措施保持了土壤养分和温度,重塑了根际细菌群落,并增强了成熟阶段土壤氮素代谢能力,与 CPMF 下的花生产量明显相关。然而,在 Bio-PMF 下则没有这种显著的关系。此外,与 Bio-PMF 相比,CPMF 使土壤中二甲基邻苯二甲酸酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)和微塑料(MPs)的含量分别显著增加了 79.93、44.55、138.72 和 14.1%。因此,CPMF 改善了土壤-花生生态,但造成了严重的土壤污染,而 Bio-PMF 向土壤中引入的污染物较少,对土壤-花生生态的影响较小。基于这些结果,未来应提高 CPMF 的降解能力或 Bio-PMF 的生态改善能力,以获得环境友好型和土壤-作物生态友好型塑料薄膜。