World Health Organization, 4518 Crown Point Lane, Mount Olive, AL, 35117, USA.
Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc., 200 Wood Avenue South, Suite 100, Iselin, NJ, 08830, USA.
Adv Ther. 2023 Jul;40(7):3217-3226. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02537-7. Epub 2023 May 28.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a recognized adverse outcome among patients with cancer. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the treatment outcomes, resource utilization, and costs associated with antiemetic use to prevent CINV in a broad US population who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Data from the STATinMED RWD Insights Database was collected from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Cohorts included any patients that had at least one claim for fosnetupitant + palonosetron (NEPA) or fosaprepitant + palonosetron (APPA) and evidence of initiating cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate nausea and vomiting visits within 14 days after chemotherapy, and generalized linear models were used to examine all-cause and CINV-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs.
NEPA was associated with significantly lower rates of nausea and vomiting visits after chemotherapy (p = 0.0001), including 86% greater odds of nausea and vomiting events for APPA during the second week after chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; p = 0.0003). The mean numbers of all-cause inpatient visits (p = 0.0195) and CINV-related inpatient and outpatient visits were lower among NEPA patients (p < 0.0001). These differences corresponded to 57% of NEPA patients and 67% of APPA patients having one or more inpatient visits (p = 0.0002). All-cause outpatient costs and CINV-related inpatient costs were also significantly lower for NEPA (p < 0.0001). The mean number of all-cause outpatient visits, all-cause inpatient costs, and CINV-related outpatient costs was not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05).
In this retrospective study based on claims data, NEPA was associated with lower rates of nausea and vomiting and lower CINV-related HCRU and costs compared to APPA following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These results complement clinical trial data and published economic models supporting the use of NEPA as a safe, effective, and cost-saving antiemetic for patients undergoing chemotherapy.
化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)是癌症患者的一种公认的不良后果。本回顾性研究旨在量化在接受顺铂为基础的化疗的广泛美国人群中,使用止吐药预防 CINV 的治疗结果、资源利用和成本,这些人群使用了奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)或福沙匹坦帕洛诺司琼(APPA)。
STATinMED RWD Insights 数据库的数据收集于 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。队列纳入了至少有一次奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)或福沙匹坦帕洛诺司琼(APPA)用药和开始顺铂为基础的化疗的证据的所有患者。使用逻辑回归评估化疗后 14 天内的恶心和呕吐就诊次数,使用广义线性模型检查全因和 CINV 相关的医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本。
NEPA 与化疗后恶心和呕吐就诊次数显著降低相关(p=0.0001),包括 APPA 在化疗后第二周恶心和呕吐事件的可能性增加 86%(比值比[OR] = 1.86;p=0.0003)。NEPA 患者的全因住院次数(p=0.0195)和 CINV 相关的住院和门诊就诊次数均较低(p<0.0001)。这些差异与 57%的 NEPA 患者和 67%的 APPA 患者有一次或多次住院就诊(p=0.0002)相对应。全因门诊费用和 CINV 相关的住院费用也显著低于 NEPA(p<0.0001)。全因门诊就诊次数、全因住院费用和 CINV 相关的门诊费用在两组之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。
在这项基于索赔数据的回顾性研究中,与 APPA 相比,奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)在接受顺铂为基础的化疗后,恶心和呕吐发生率较低,CINV 相关 HCRU 和成本也较低。这些结果补充了支持使用奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)作为化疗患者安全、有效和节省成本的止吐药的临床试验数据和已发表的经济模型。