Screening epitope peptides based on a phage-displayed random peptide and peptide microarrays to contribute to improving the diagnostic efficiency of systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases in China. At present, there are hundreds of autoantibodies in SLE patients; however, only a dozen of the autoantibodies can be routinely detected, and the available diagnostic antibodies are not sufficient for diagnosis or differential diagnosis of SLE patients with atypical clinical manifestations or other autoimmune diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to find new diagnostic markers to improve the diagnostic effect of SLE.

METHODS

The displayed random peptide library and peptide microarray were combined to identify SLE-related epitope peptides. A case-control design was used. The IgG antibodies in the sera from SLE patients, healthy controls, and other autoimmune disease controls underwent a reaction with the phage-display random peptide library, respectively. Selected epitope peptides were used to construct a peptide chip. A total of 644 serum samples (including 296 SLE patients, 168 disease controls, and 180 healthy controls) were used for further screening and verification. Peptides with an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.650 were further verified by ELISA. Finally, 500 serum samples (including 200 SLE patients, 150 disease controls, and 150 healthy controls) were used to verify and evaluate the diagnostic and differential diagnostic efficacy of the selected peptides.

RESULTS

After the previous screening, five epitope peptides (SLE_P19, SLE_P20, SLE_P27, SLE_P28, and SLE_P29) may have potential as SLE diagnostic markers. Additionally, SLE_P27 was superior to the other four peptides in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SLE and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The AUC of SLE_P27 was 0.938, the sensitivity was 76.00%, the specificity was 92.70%, the positive likelihood ratio was 10.411, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.259, and the accuracy was 84.40%. The diagnostic efficacy of SLE can be increased by combining the five selected peptides with the anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) and anti-Smith antibodies (anti-Sm).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified five peptides that may serve as potential biomarkers for SLE diagnosis using the strategy of combining the displayed random peptide library with the peptide microarray. The combination of selected peptides and existing autoantibodies can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency. These specific peptides are expected to be new diagnostic markers for SLE.