Ge S L, Wang X F, Liu L, Zhang X D, Dou Y C, Gong M Q, Li X J
Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China.
Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 6;103(21):1631-1637. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230128-00132.
To investigate the clinical efficacy of dynamic cross screw system (FNS) for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients with posterior medial comminution. A retrospective cohort study. Clinical data of 197 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures accompanied by posterior medial comminution treated with closed reduction FNS and internal fixation with anti-rotation cannulated screws in Beijing Luhe Hospital, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital and Beijing Tongren Hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups. There were 102 patients in the FNS group, included 55 males and 47 females with a mean age of (40.49±19.79) years; and there were 95 patients in the FNS plus anti-rotation hollow screw group (combined group), included 51 males and 44 females with an average age of (40.03±18.82) years. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year after surgery. The general clinical data, surgical conditions and Harris score of the hip joint at the last follow-up of the two groups were compared. And the clinical efficacy of the two surgical schemes were evaluated and compared. After surgery, routine X-ray and CT examinations were performed to evaluate the fracture reduction and internal fixation, and the shortening of the femoral neck on the affected side was compared to that of healthy side according to the Zlowodzki method. At the last follow-up, the incidence of fracture reduction loss, screw resection and coxa vara in the combined group were all significantly lower than those in the FNS group [10 (10.5%) vs 28 (27.4%), 1 (1.0%) vs 7 (6.8%) and 9 (9.4%) vs 21 (20.5%), respectively, all <0.05]. The incidence of nonunion and necrosis of the femoral head in the combined group were both lower than those in the FNS group, but there was no significant difference between two groups (both >0.05). The postoperative mild, moderate and severe femoral neck shortening in the combined group were all lower than those in the FNS group, and the difference were not statistically significant (all >0.05). At the last follow-up, the Harris score in the combined group was 84.60±2.08, and it was higher than that in the FNS group (79.57±4.31), but the difference was not statistically significant (=0.403). FNS plus supporting hollow screw has a good clinical effect on femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged adults with posterior medial comminution.
探讨动力交叉螺钉系统(FNS)治疗中青年股骨颈骨折合并后内侧粉碎的临床疗效。一项回顾性队列研究。回顾性分析2019年10月至2021年10月在北京潞河医院、北京积水潭医院和北京同仁医院采用闭合复位FNS联合抗旋转空心螺钉内固定治疗的197例中青年股骨颈骨折合并后内侧粉碎患者的临床资料。根据不同手术方法将患者分为两组。FNS组102例,其中男性55例,女性47例,平均年龄(40.49±19.79)岁;FNS联合抗旋转空心螺钉组(联合组)95例,其中男性51例,女性44例,平均年龄(40.03±18.82)岁。所有患者术后至少随访1年。比较两组末次随访时的一般临床资料、手术情况及髋关节Harris评分。并对两种手术方案的临床疗效进行评估和比较。术后行常规X线及CT检查评估骨折复位及内固定情况,按Zlowodzki法比较患侧股骨颈与健侧股骨颈缩短情况。末次随访时,联合组骨折复位丢失、螺钉切出及髋内翻发生率均显著低于FNS组[分别为10例(10.5%)对28例(27.4%)、1例(1.0%)对7例(6.8%)、9例(9.4%)对21例(20.5%),均P<0.05]。联合组股骨头不愈合及坏死发生率均低于FNS组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。联合组术后股骨颈轻度、中度及重度缩短均低于FNS组,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。末次随访时,联合组Harris评分为84.60±2.08,高于FNS组(79.57±4.31),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.403)。FNS联合支撑空心螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折合并后内侧粉碎具有良好的临床效果。