• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心随机试验:超声引导腕管松解术与小切口技术的比较。

Multicenter randomized trial of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance versus mini-open technique.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

ATX Orthopedics, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul;20(7):597-605. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2218548. Epub 2023 May 30.

DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2218548
PMID:37254502
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) vs. mini-open CTR (mOCTR) are limited, prompting development of this randomized trial to compare efficacy and safety of these techniques.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomized (2:1) to CTR-US or mOCTR, treated by experienced hand surgeons (median previous cases: 12 CTR-US; 1000 mOCTR), and followed for 3 months.

RESULTS

Among 149 randomized patients, 122 received CTR-US ( = 94) or mOCTR ( = 28). Mean incision length was 6 ± 2 mm in the wrist (CTR-US) vs. 22 ± 7 mm in the palm (mOCTR) ( < 0.001). Median time to return to daily activities (2 vs. 2 days;  = 0.81) and work (3 vs. 4 days;  = 0.61) were similar. Both groups reported statistically significant and clinically important improvements in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity and Functional Status Scales, Numeric Pain Scale, and EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level, with no statistical differences between groups. Freedom from wound sensitivity and pain favored CTR-US (61.1% vs. 17.9%;  < 0.001). Adverse event rates were low in each group (2.1% vs. 3.6%;  = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of CTR-US were comparable to mOCTR despite less previous surgical experience with CTR-US. The choice of CTR technique should be determined by shared decision-making between patient and physician.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05405218.

摘要

背景

超声引导下腕管松解术(CTR-US)与小切口开放腕管松解术(mOCTR)的比较研究有限,这促使我们开展了这项随机试验,以比较这两种技术的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

患者被随机(2:1)分为 CTR-US 组或 mOCTR 组,由经验丰富的手外科医生进行治疗(中位数既往病例数:12 例 CTR-US;1000 例 mOCTR),并随访 3 个月。

结果

在 149 例随机患者中,122 例接受了 CTR-US( = 94)或 mOCTR( = 28)治疗。手腕处的平均切口长度为 6 ± 2 mm(CTR-US),手掌处为 22 ± 7 mm(mOCTR)( < 0.001)。恢复日常活动(2 天 vs. 2 天;  = 0.81)和工作(3 天 vs. 4 天;  = 0.61)的中位时间相似。两组患者在波士顿腕管问卷症状严重程度和功能状态量表、数字疼痛量表和 EuroQoL-5 维度 5 级评分方面均报告了统计学上显著和临床上重要的改善,且组间无统计学差异。在无伤口敏感性和疼痛方面,CTR-US 更具优势(61.1% vs. 17.9%;  < 0.001)。两组不良事件发生率均较低(2.1% vs. 3.6%;  = 0.55)。

结论

尽管 CTR-US 的手术经验较少,但 CTR-US 的疗效和安全性与 mOCTR 相当。选择 CTR 技术应取决于患者和医生之间的共同决策。

临床试验注册

www.clinicaltrials.gov 标识符为 NCT05405218。

相似文献

1
Multicenter randomized trial of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance versus mini-open technique.多中心随机试验:超声引导腕管松解术与小切口技术的比较。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul;20(7):597-605. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2218548. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Trial of ultrasound guided carpal tunnel release versus traditional open release (TUTOR).超声引导腕管松解术与传统开放式松解术的比较试验(TUTOR)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 14;101(41):e30775. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030775.
3
Final 1-Year Results of the TUTOR Randomized Trial Comparing Carpal Tunnel Release with Ultrasound Guidance to Mini-open Technique.比较超声引导下腕管松解术与小切口技术的TUTOR随机试验的1年最终结果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 4;12(3):e5665. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005665. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: 6-month Outcomes From the Multicenter ROBUST Trial.超声引导下门诊腕管松解术:多中心ROBUST试验的6个月结果
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 19;6(3):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.12.005. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Ultrasound (US) Changes in the Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area After Microinvasive US-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release.超声引导微创腕管松解术后正中神经横截面积的变化。
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Apr;39(4):693-702. doi: 10.1002/jum.15146. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
Protocol of a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance (ROBUST).超声引导下门诊腕管松解术多中心前瞻性试验方案(ROBUST)
Cureus. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):e37479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37479. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Multicenter pragmatic study of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance.超声引导下腕管松解术的多中心实用研究
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Mar;19(3):273-280. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2048816. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
A Comparison of Changes in Median Nerve Cross-sectional Area Between Endoscopic and Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.内镜下与小切口开放性腕管松解术中正中神经横截面积变化的比较。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2019 Oct 31;2(2):80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.09.010. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.小切口腕管松解术的最佳证据系统评价与Meta分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Sep 27;6(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.08.005. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Long-term Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance.超声引导下腕管松解术的长期临床疗效。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Nov;17(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1177/1558944720988080. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Carpal Tunnel Release Using a New Surgical Knife With and Without Ultrasound Guidance: Comparative Study in 100 Cadaveric Specimens.使用新型手术刀在有和没有超声引导的情况下进行腕管松解术的安全性和有效性:100例尸体标本的比较研究
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 May 22;7(4):100729. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.019. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Comparative assessment of seven surgical procedures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a network meta-analysis empowering physician-patient decision-making.腕管综合征七种手术方法的比较评估:一项增强医患决策能力的网状Meta分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jun 5;48(1):486. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03587-x.
3
Comparison of carpal tunnel release with double mini-incision approach and traditional approach: A retrospective study.
腕管松解术双小切口入路与传统入路的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 16;104(20):e42510. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042510.
4
Percutaneous Ultrasound-Assisted Carpal Tunnel Release Using Sono-Instruments®.使用Sono-Instruments®经皮超声辅助腕管松解术
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66899. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance in Over 100 Patients at Two to Six Years.超声引导下腕管松解术治疗100余例患者2至6年的临床结果
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Apr 1;6(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.004. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: 6-month Outcomes From the Multicenter ROBUST Trial.超声引导下门诊腕管松解术:多中心ROBUST试验的6个月结果
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 19;6(3):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.12.005. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 May 23;10(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00521-1.
8
Prospective evaluation of a novel device for ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of carpal tunnel and trigger finger disease. Efficacy and safety of sono-instruments®.新型超声引导经皮治疗腕管和扳机指疾病的设备的前瞻性评估。sono-instruments® 的疗效和安全性。
J Ultrasound. 2024 Dec;27(4):873-885. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00851-y. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
9
Final 1-Year Results of the TUTOR Randomized Trial Comparing Carpal Tunnel Release with Ultrasound Guidance to Mini-open Technique.比较超声引导下腕管松解术与小切口技术的TUTOR随机试验的1年最终结果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 4;12(3):e5665. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005665. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Early Return to Work after Carpal Tunnel Release with Ultrasound Guidance.超声引导下腕管松解术后的早期重返工作岗位
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 27;12(2):e5647. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005647. eCollection 2024 Feb.